[bksvol-discuss] Re: A scanning question from a new volunteer
- From: "Gerald Hovas" <GeraldHovas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:59:31 -0500
Kathy,
You'll need to tell us what software you are using to edit your books, and
probably what software you use to scan them in order for us to help. It
also helps to include info like which operating system you are using, plus
any software you are using to access the screen, like JAWS or Window Eyes
since the numbers you are refering to could be something that the software
is throwing in when it reads or displays the info on the screen.
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Szinnyey
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 1:50 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] A scanning question from a new volunteer
Hi, all! I've been using books from Bookshare for awhile and would very
much like to start giving back. I don't have a lot of time, but I do have
time to at least do some scanning. I just bought one of these really cool
Optilek Book scanners and really like it! My question is, how do I get
these pesky little numbers that show up in the text I scan out of there?
These are not page numbers, just these little numbers, neatly arranged
chronologically from 1 to infinity. I had this problem many years ago with
stuff I'd been scanning, and then those numbers mysteriously disappeared on
their own. Any idea about what's going on and what to do about it?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Kathy
Kathy Szinnyey
joyfulrenegade@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
or
fredkate@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lora" <loravara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:44 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: bookshare seems to be interested in quantity
>I believe that you are correct. And perhaps it is the proper strategy at
> this point, though I'm not certain of it. One thought process might be
> that
> it's important in the first few years of Bookshare's life to build
> numbers,
> to show that the collection can grow when driven by the needs and wants of
> the blind membership.
>
> On the other hand, many people, myself included, won't touch a fair book,
> and would argue that they don't really count as a part of the collection
> as
> they are of such inferior quality.
>
> Why do I envision myself like Tevia ... He's right ... No, he's right.
>
> Ah, just rambling.
>
> Lora
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:32 AM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] bookshare seems to be interested in quantity
>
> I suspect that bookshare still wants to give most of the monetary reward
> to
> the person submitting the book rather than the person validating it and so
> is not likely to make the difference more "equitable" as you want. I base
> this suspicion on the fact that bookshare still permits submits of poor
> quality books rather than raising the bar, thereby making less work for
> validators and improving the quality of bookshare's collection. Bookshare
> for now seems to want to keep the bar low and strive for quantity.
>
> E.
> At 07:15 AM 9/26/2006, you wrote:
>
>>Hi Monica,
>>
>>I do understand that some people validate for credits, and there's
>>nothing at all wrong with that. On the other hand, many of the people
>>on this list, yourself included, strike me as dedicated, and willing to
>>do a good job for Bookshare at the same time. Originally, Evan I think
>>it was, said that by offering more money, people would just rush
>>through their validations to get the credits. Although this may be
>>true for some, I still find it hard to believe that most volunteers
>>would do that. Didn't someone say that only seven people paid for their
> memberships through their volunteer efforts?
>>
>>On the other hand, I'd rather see the pay scale changed entirely.
>>Perhaps
>>$2 for submissions, and $1 for validation, would balance the scales
>>more equably.
>>
>>This would balance so that 25 submissions, or 50 validations, would pay
>>for a renewal of membership.
>>
>>And if offering more for validations would cause people to race through
>>a validation, offering less would seem to encourage people to race even
>>faster. After all, if I'll only make fifty cents per validation, that
>>means I'll have to validate 100 books to get through the renewal
>>process. Better validate real fast!
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Monica
>>Willyard
>>Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 10:50 PM
>>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
>>
>>Hi, Cindy. I have a scanner and use Openbook to scan. What I was
>>trying to say is that without credits, I wouldn't do much on the
>>validating side of things. As it is, I do validation both for the
>>credit and because we have a pretty hefty step 1 page right now. Lora
>>was talking about not validating for credits, and that is what I was
>>responding to. (smile)
>>
>>Monica Willyard
>>
>>On Monday 9/25/2006 11:34 PM, you wrote:
>> >Monica,
>> >
>> >One gets so much more monetary credit for scanning, and all you'd
>> >really have to do after a scan is to check the copyright page and put
>> >the right info in the submission form; go through the book and be
>> >sure no pages have been omitted (we've all done that, and
>> >double-scanned a page, too); and delete junk characters; and run a
>> >spell-check. So you validate because you don't have a scanner? I
>> >think some can be had relatively inexpensively and it might pay you n
>> >the
> long run.
>> >
>> >I don't blame you at all for validating for the credits. I probably
>> >would work for the credits, too. I admit that in my lifetime I have
>> >volunteered my time and efforts rather than donated money, not only
>> >because I feel I'm being useful but because I don't have that much
>> >money to donate. smile
>> >
>> >Cindy
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
>>list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
> line.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
>>list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
> line.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
