Hi Judy and Others, I am always surprised when I download an excellent book and find that it's definitely not. Although these books are frustrating discoveries, I think the majority of Excellent books are deserving of that rating. Getting a book up to that rating is a joint effort, though. Like you, I appreciate the scanners' comments, explaining the validation steps that they followed before submitting the book. It doesn't change my approach to validating, but it informs me of how much time my validation process is likely to take. For what it's worth, I begin by searching for the number 1, in combinations such as 1 1' 1. 1? And so forth. I then search for random characters that typically don't belong in the book: caret, accent, tilde, percent, pound, and so on. By finding these and eliminating them, if appropriate, I get an overall glimpse of how much validating needs to be done. Spell-check or not to spell-check: I then make a determination on whether I'll run the spellchecker. For most novels and nonfiction, I will; but for books such as Buddhism in Action, where I'm battling two spelling problems, lots of Hindi words and lots of scanographical errors that resulted in actual words, I've determined that it isn't worth it to run spell check. I'll rely on my full reading of the book to catch errors. I then scan for common scanos, such as die for the and comer for corner. If I don't find lots of these, I figure it's a good sign. I usually then start reading the book. Since I'm going to read straight through, this is when I check things like whether all the pages are there, whether lines are missing, whether certain text is garbled, etc. I've found that there are errors that are better caught with speech, and other errors better caught with Braille. Example: One excellent book I downloaded might have read all right with Braille, but was a nightmare when I read it with speech. This was a book I wanted to read, and one I did read, even though there weren't spaces after quotation marks, resulting in things like, "I hate this,"she said. (Funny thing is, JAWS reads this just fine, but my Pacmate tried to run this and she together because there was no space. It did this all through the book, because neither the scanner or validator went in and put spaces after the quotation marks. This is the kind of thing we need to find good ways to catch. Finally, if the book has indices or other extras, I make a determination as to whether they can be salvaged. I think I've only ever deleted one index, which was very nearly garbled beyond recognition. It was for a very short book, and I felt it didn't add much to the book. As I'm uploading, I review everything that will be visible when the book goes into the collection. For instance, I check the short and long synopses, title, author, publisher, copyright date, ISBN, and the selected categories and adult rating etc., to make sure it looks good. I'm not saying I won't miss things, but this is the rough process I use. One of my frustrations is when a scanner uploads a book and marks it as excellent, and then I open the book and it's clearly not. I downloaded one recently where I found lots of missing words or garbled lines, and I knew I wouldn't be able to correct it easily. I simply returned the book to step one, as I figured it'd take more effort to fix it than I felt I could manage. I guess I could see how it might have gotten an excellent rating, as there were good-sized chunks of very readable text, but when it went bad, it was really bad. I'd appreciate an honest rating. The book probably deserved good, which at least would have warned potential validators that it would require a fair bit of work. May I ask scanners how they determine whether to rate their submissions as good or excellent? And I'd love to see Bookshare scan the book on initial submission, and offer a potential rating. Does it do this yet? I know it's something we've talked about in the past. Finally, I'd love to see a way to leave a comment as to why a validator returned a book to step one. This could include comments such as: Frequent Hindi words; not familiar enough to validate ... Or has lots of pictures that will require interpretation by a sighted person ... Or even ... This book has too many errors for me to validate at this time. I hope there's value in some of this. Mostly, it's just me thinking publicly. -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy s. Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:08 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Books rated excellent recently added to the collection that are really only good Let me add my 'ditto' to the complaints posted here today about books entering the collection recently that aren't up to snuff. I was just crabbing off-list to Grandma Cindy about this last week. I've downloaded several books this last month that had just entered the collection which had many obvious errors, but were rated excellent. I've certainly missed stuff myself when validating, even though I read through every single book I validate, but the errors I found in downloaded books were things like chapter after chapter with "1" instead of "I" in the text. As a validator, I appreciate scanners like Shelley and Mayrie (and many others) who put in their comments whether or not they've read the scan through, if they've spell-checked it, stripped headings, verified page numbers and the like. I'm much more likely to download a book from the step 1 list if that information is available, because I know what to expect and can judge how much time I will have to allocate to give that book the attention it might need. Judy s. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.