Hi all,Well, Cindy, if nonfiction books which are outdated aren't to be kept, then how is somebody supposed to learn about what was happening in South Africa in 1985? Books written about events in the past, I feel are perhaps more accurate in their portrayal of those events when they are written closer in time to those events. Obviously, a book written about the social situation in South Africa in 1985 would not be factually correct in many things. However, it would be a valuable source of information.
Might as well get rid of all the books written about the cold war, then. The cold war is over, the Berlin wall is down. Russia is now a loose confederation of countries. That doesn't make any books written between 1950 and 1990 invalid, they're just inaccurate for today.
I vote for keeping them. But then, I vote for keeping all books. <smiling> Shoot, I'd give anything for copies of histories from The Library Of Alexandria. Sure, they'd be inaccurate, and they'd leave out a whole half of the world, but wow, what a treasure! Unfortunately, The Library Of Alexandria was burned down some twenty centuries ago.
Ann P. -- Ann K. Parsons Portal Tutoring EMAIL: akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.portaltutoring.info Skype: Putertutor "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost."Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.