I am also using word 2002; how do you get it not to say its own numbers; at least I guess that's what I'm hearing since they don't show up on my braille display. . ----- Original Message ----- From: Dilsiaa@xxxxxxx To: BksVol-Discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:52 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Killers Wake by Bernard Cornwell Hi guys: Before I submit a book, I check that the page numbers are there, and if there is a blank page I skip the blank page a put a comment in the following page, Page 128 is a blank page on page 129 near the top and so on. If the page is a picture what I do is to write a caption of the picture and type the page number, so I can keep the exact number of pages in the submission file. Also there are pages at the beginning of the books that are not part of the book body numeration, sometimes there are six or more unnumbered pages. The thing is to include all the book info and text from the hardcopy<smile The program I use is Word XP 2002 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:44:58 -0400 From: The Pardees <fpardee@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Killers Wake by Bernard Cornwell -- The way I handle books that have pictures and captions on non numbered pages is to skip the pictures and keep the numbered pages in order. Then I scan the pages with pictures and captions and place them at the end of the book, with a note in the table of content that photos are at the end of the book. Jim At 10:37 AM 6/14/04 -0500, you wrote: > >I realize it can be hard to check to make sure a book is all there and in >the correct order, but a common cause of such a problem is pages with >pictures that are not part of the numbering skeem, but which contain >informative captions. I always keep these pages, but because I know >validating can be difficult with a book like that, I note the numbering >discrepancy and it's cause in the comments field when submitting. >I write this message just to make people aware of books like this, and to >give both submitters and validators an idea of what to do with them. I am >not saying that books with messed up page numbering should be accepted when >you aren't sure everything is there. :-) > >Sarah Van Oosterwijck >curious entity at earthlink dot net > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Guido Corona" <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx> >To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:33 AM >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Killers Wake by Bernard Cornwell -- Sorry, had to >nuke it > > >> Late last week I reviewed Killer's Wake by Bernard Cornwell. Sorry I had >> to rejected in spite of the fact that the book was outwardly of excellent >> quality. Unfortunately when I wen I performed a page integrity check by >> sampling every 20 pages or so, I realized the book was badly out of >> kilter. By page 50 there was already an offset of 4 pages. I tried to do >> some repair, but crucial page numbers were missing in the problem spots >> and I was not able to determine exactly what/where the problem was. These >> kinds of situations can only be fixed by the submitter. >> >> While it is not necessary to perform complete quality checks and >> spellchecks before submitting a book, it is important to perform a >> thorough page integrity check, so that the book is submitted in its >> entirety, without page omissions or duplications. This will make book >> approval a lot faster. >> If the original submitter can fix book integrity, I will be happy to fix >> the rest of the book in short order. Thanks, Guido >> >> >> >> >> Guido D. Corona >> IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. >> IBM Research, >> Phone: (512) 838-9735 >> Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: >> http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html >> >> >> >> >> >> "Reggie & Lonnie" <regandlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> 06/14/2004 06:28 AM >> Please respond to >> bksvol-discuss >> >> >> To >> <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> cc >> >> Subject >> [bksvol-discuss] Re: An apollogy! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I want to apologize to everyone. I had downloaded books that I was >> continuously checking, but it has taken me more time. I downloaded a lot >> of >> books mistakenly as I was very afraid I would have to work on books I >> would >> not feel comfortable validating as they were about subjects I know little >> about. Jesse said to not keep them so long unless I could do them quickly >> so I have tried to place back on the validation list some of the books >> that >> were older. Again, I apologize, and I hope someone who has more time than >> I >> actually have can help get these finished, and hopefully I can validate >> quicker in the future. >> >> Reggie >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 6/4/04 > -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --