[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis lost

  • From: "Jesse Fahnestock" <Jesse.F@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:15:13 -0700

Yes, I can confirm that Iceberg was once available on Bookshare.org and had to 
be withdrawn. I can also confirm that the only problem's we're encountering 
with overwritten synopses are in the cases of submissions replacing previously 
available books. It's a challenge we're still working on.
 
jesse.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guido Corona
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:24 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis 
lost



If I recall correctly,  that was Iceberg,  by Clive Cussler. 

G. 


Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone:  (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html





"Jesse Fahnestock" <Jesse.F@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 


06/17/2004 10:33 AM 


Please respond to
bksvol-discuss



To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

cc

Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis lost

        




can you give me the title? it may be that the book had been previously 
submitted, even if it does not appear to be available currently. 
  
jesse. 
  
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guido Corona
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 5:32 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis 
lost


OK,  that is excellent if it is the case.  But I submitted a book including 
synopsis.  Then did my own publishing.  At the 2nd upload,  the synopsis were 
lost,  and so were the categories assigment.  There may be more than meets the 
eye. 

G. 


Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone:  (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html




"Jesse Fahnestock" <Jesse.F@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 


06/17/2004 10:23 AM 



Please respond to
bksvol-discuss




To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

cc

Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis lost


        





Guido: 
 
I don't think you are correct here. I'm not sure I understand your assessment 
of the issue; however, the only time that a validator's synopsis changes will 
be lost, as far as i know, are in the cases of replacement books that Pam 
describes. 
 
jesse. 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guido Corona
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:38 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis 
lost


Pam,  that was the old bug.  The new bug behaves much more simply.  It don't 
matter no mo' whattch ya do.  De bad woids in them synapsuses is gonna be 
goane! 

G. 


Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone:  (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html



Pam Quinn <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 


06/16/2004 05:34 PM 



Please respond to
bksvol-discuss





To
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

cc

Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis lost




        






When that happened to me for the first time, I figured it was because
I was replacing a book and the original did not have a synopsis. Guess
that wasn't the case then.

Pam

Original message:



>Attention submitters and reviewers.  Any short synopsis, long synopsis, 
>and category assignments you may have made to a book record during 
>submission are not retained at approval time.  You will find these fields 
>to be blank when you approve the book.  If you do not feel like concoting 
>new synopsis,  try to get in touch with the submitter to obtain the 
>original ones.  I have already alerted Gustavo of the problem.  This is 
>actually a regression problem,  which has been appearing and disappearing 
>over the last couple of years.
>
>Oh yes,  and remember to reassign book categories at approval time,  those 
>are lost as well.
>
>Finally,  just in case,  on the approval screen,  please make sure that 
>the quality rating assigned by the system matches the error rate.  There 
>is a chance that that one may be experiencing problems as well.
>
>Guido




Other related posts: