[bksvol-discuss] Rui's page
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Rui,
I think every once in a while, maybe once a week or
so, you should post the URL for your page -- or
include it under your name when you post --in case
people haven't bookmarked it or saved it somewhere.
Just suggestion.
Cindy
--- Rui Cabral <rui@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> This is not run by bookshare but is maintained by
> myself..
>
> the address is:
> http://members.cox.net/booksharescans
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James Nuttall
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:59 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: quality
>
>
> Where do I find the booksare scanning page?
>
> Jim Nuttall -- Michigan
>
>
> Rui Cabral <rui@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Susan:
>
> Depending on how much of a clean-up job your
> referring too, that book
> probably should be rescanned instead of cleaned
> up. It will take less time
> and be more accurate.
> Again thats where lists such as the bookshare
> scanning page come in handy.
> (I feel like am running an ad campaign for my
> site)
> In that case,
> "I'm Rui Cabral and I approve of this message!!"
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Susan Lumpkin"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 7:28 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: quality
>
>
> > Rui,
> >
> > It may mean I submit less books to Bookshare
> but I'd rather they are
> readable!
> >
> > Have several questions - am unsure as to whom
> they should be addressed
> but I'll ask them anyway. Let's say I download a
> book from Bookshare which
> has been accepted. Besides rescanning it, which
> I would prefer to leave to
> someone else, if I find errors (it may be rated
> good or fair), and wish to
> correct them, is there a way the book can be
> resubmitted again? If so, what
> would the procedure be? Thanks in advance and
> hope this makes sense.
> >
> > Have a great weekend everyone and happy
> reading, scanning, validating or
> whatever else you may be doing!
> >
> > SL
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > .From: "Rui Cabral"
> > .Sent: 8/27/04 5:47:39 PM
> > .To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> > .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: quality
> > .
> > .Hi Susan:
> > .Don't worry, you and David aren't alone.
> There are many of us here who
> want
> > .the collection to be of high quality.
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .----- Original Message -----
> > .From: "Susan Lumpkin"
> > .To:
> > .Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 6:43 PM
> > .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to
> Reject!!
> > .
> > .
> > .> David, I do the same and it's nice to know
> someone else does as well.
> Have
> > .a good weekend.
> > .>
> > .> -----Original Message-----
> > .> .From: "David"
> > .> .Sent: 8/27/04 3:35:20 PM
> > .> .To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> > .> .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to
> Reject!!
> > .> .
> > .> .I guess I am a little insane. I actually
> use a spell checker on the
> books
> > .> .which I am validating and do my best to
> bring them up to excellent
> > .quality.
> > .> .
> > .> .David
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .> .-----Original Message-----
> > .> .From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > .> .[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@freelist
> s.org] On Behalf Of Mike Pietruk
> > .> .Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:53 AM
> > .> .To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > .> .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] When to Reject!!
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .> .I am now validating a novel on which I
> have to decide whether the text
> is
> > .> .readable enough or not. The book is all
> there, I can follow the
> story,
> > .> .but there are a lot of words scrambled and
> missing. Where does one
> draw
> > .> .the line between accepting it as a fair
> book or canning it?
> > .> .It has been sitting in the pool for a
> couple of months with no one
> > .> .touching it. The book is scanned by a
> frequent contributor though
> this
> > .> .particular book doesn't come up to what
> has been done by this
> individual
> > .> .in the past.
> > .> .
> > .> .I could easily return it to the pool; but
> this likely would place the
> > .book
> > .> .in li mbo for who knows how long?
> > .> .
> > .> .So, how poor does fair text have to be to
> be bad text?
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .> .---
> > .> .Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > .> .Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > .> .Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 -
> Release Date: 8/24/2004
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .> .---
> > .> .Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > .> .Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > .> .Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 -
> Release Date: 8/24/2004
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .> .
> > .>
> > .>
> > .>
> > .
> > .
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Other related posts:
