[bksvol-discuss] Surprising Validations

  • From: Monica Willyard <plumlipstick@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:22:20 -0400

Hi everybody. I've been validating a lot lately and have taken a few of the textbooks. I was surprised to find that they have actually been my easiest validations this week. Both textbooks I've done in the past 4 days have been practically spotless so that all I had to do is verify the copyright and make sure the pages were all there. Another textbook had pristine text but was missing some pages and didn't have page breaks. It was rejected for that reason. I'm sure this isn't true for every textbook, but you might be surprised at how easy the well-scanned textbooks go for validation. I was expecting to need to read them word by word and make corrections throughout the text. I was delighted to find that Word only found some technical terms when I ran the spellchecker. The mistakes had been corrected already. Two of the books I took this week had been on step 1 for over six months, one of them had been there for a year and a half. I'd have done them ages ago if I'd known they'd be so easy. I guess I'm learning that I shouldn't make assumptions about text quality based on the subject of a book.


Monica Willyard

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts:

  • » [bksvol-discuss] Surprising Validations