Guido and Mary, Do I understand you correctly, that if a validator changes or adds a synopsis, short or long, to a book that doesn't seem to have an adequate one from the submitter, the change/addition doesn't "take?" I've done that on several occasions, including the book I just uploaded, Thermodynamics of Pizza. I added a little bit to the short synopsis and quite a bit, quoted from the fly leaf, to the long synopsis,where there was nothing. Why wouldn't the changes show up? If they don't, then there's no way for a validator to put what a submitter omitted. I suspect that there are quite a few submitters who don't read the books the scan. A sighted volunteer probably doesn't have the kind of scanner that reads the scan aloud, and from the quanity of books some members submit, I can't believe they read them all before submitting them, though I may be wrong. On another topic--I downloaded the aforementioned book as a txt file, worked on it as Word, saved it as an rtf file, and hoped to upload it that way but discovered that I had to upload it as the txt file it was in the first place. This is the first time I've downloaded a txt file. I chose the text only option from my save choices, but it did warn that the formatting might not be saved, and I know there have been recent discussions here about lost formatting. My other options were text with line breaks or text with layout. Should I have used one of them? It appeared to me that the formatting was o.k., but if anyone takes the book and discovers a problem, I still have the rtf file and can submit that as well. Cindy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover