HI Jim, Yes, the validation process should not take hours or days but.... Do we move to a system where books are rejected much more often or use the skills that many validators have developed and open up a meaningful discussion on reviewing the current system and finding an agreeable way to bring equality into the scanning and validating process? Katie Hill Miracles happen not in opposition to Nature, but in opposition to what we know of Nature. -St. Augustine -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The Pardees Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 1:12 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] another opinion To the validating perfectionists, While the time and effort you spend is wonderful and admirable, spending hours or days validating for fifty cents is ridiculous unless you have an inner drive and the satisfaction you receive for a perfect job is twenty times the remuneration. In the beginning, Jesse's estimated time for a validation was twenty minutes. I spend from two to three hours removing junk characters and spell checking after scanning and from the bookshare ratings and the comments I have had from many of the validators my scans are quite acceptable. In my opinion if it takes much longer to correct errors the book should be rejected and the submitter should receive no credits. Perhaps it might encourage better submissions. Jim .< To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.