[bksvol-discuss] Re: better quality book rejected

  • From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:53:07 -0400

Hi Cindy:

If I was your friend I would resubmit the better quality book. I would include in the comment box that it is a replacement for the one in the collection. The other thing I would do, would be to have someone with K1000 validate the book so that they can compare the 2 copies.

The other thing that I suggest is that when there are duplicates they should be left for those who have K1000 to compare which is the better copy.
Just my 2 cent's worth.

Grace

Cindy Wrote 
However I do know of one person who is so upset that
she wasn't paid attention that she is henceforth only
going to scan enough for her annual membership and no
more. She told me that she has friends who are doing
the same thing. It seems that a book she spent a long
time on perfecting was  rejected because an inhouse
volunteer's or staff member's book had been put in
before hers -- and when she pointed out that her book
had a better quality rating nothing was done about it.
She felt, as you state, that she wasn't listened to --
no explanation was given as to why the lesser-quality
book wa kept and her better-quality book, after all
her work, was rejected.

Cindy
And o



____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs







--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005


Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. bksvol-discuss
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2005