[bksvol-discuss] Re: chapter titles and ro,am numerals

  • From: Dasha Radford <dasha95@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:50:37 -0500

I apologize for the off-topic message but I need all visually impaired harpists 
to contact me off list because I have received an email from someone at APH 
looking for names of people who might be willing to travel to Louisville to 
perform a few o Carolan Tunes. It might be  good if you have some passing 
acquaintance with Celtic and folk harps even if you're Main harp isn't a Celtic 
or folk harp. The only other real specification this person gave me was that 
the harpist in question must be visually impaired.
Thank you,
Daria

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 5, 2012, at 12:18 PM, "Sue Stevens" <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  
> Reggie,
>  
> You have it right according to what has been decided. I leave them too, but I 
> do put chapter in front of the Roman numerals if it is not already there.
>  
> Sue S.
>  
>  
> From: Regina Alvarado
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 10:01 AM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: chapter titles and ro,am numerals
>  
> Cindy:
> I am doing this too, although chapter is already in front of the number.  In 
> Braille, I have no problem using either.  I always leave as is.  Now someone 
> may correct me on this if wrong and something else has been decided?
> Reggie
>  
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cindy Rosenthal
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 10:44 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] chapter titles and ro,am numerals
>  
> Something just occurred to me as i was checking pagination of a book: the 
> chapter numbers are roman n roman numerals. Would it be easier for blind 
> members if the were in Arabic numbers, and is that a change  that it's legal 
> to make? (I'm putting the word chapter  front of the number)
> Cindy
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5375 - Release Date: 11/05/12

Other related posts: