[bksvol-discuss] Re: derange perfectionism: an historical perspective

  • From: "Lori Castner" <loralee.castner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 08:31:27 -0700

Sue, I'm not very interested in this thread, but I don't get it either, so 
you're not alone!

Lori C.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sue Stevens 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 5:56 AM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: derange perfectionism: an historical perspective


  Well, I still don’t get it.  Please clarify.  (smile)

  Sue S.


  From: Valerie Maples 
  Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 4:20 AM
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: derange perfectionism: an historical perspective

  OCD  rearranged onto alphabetical order; kind of an OCD'ers inside joke. grin.


  Valerie

  Sent from my iPad

  On Aug 14, 2011, at 2:49 AM, "Sue Stevens" <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


    What does CDO stand for?

    Sue S.


    From: Carrie Karnos 
    Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 10:12 PM
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: derange perfectionism: an historical 
perspective

    Well, I do love the term deranged perfectionist, which certainly describes 
me and several other (ahem!) people in the volunteer group. I think a person 
really has to have a bit of OCD (not a lot, just a little) in order to do a 
good job at proofing books. 



    Did I ever mention a T-shirt I saw that said:
    I have CDO. It's like OCD, but the letters are in the correct order, like 
they should be!


    What a great shirt!


    Carrie



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx>
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 10:52 AM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: derange perfectionism: an historical 
perspective

    Well, I suppose that establishes Carrie as the originator and it confirms 
that it originated before I was on the list. It also confirms something else I 
have noticed. Kim really likes the phrase. That is not a criticism of her. It 
is just something I have definitely noticed.


    _    _      _

    "Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think 
and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, 
the lack of evidence." - Richard Dawkins


    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter..com/rogerbailey81


    The Militant:
    http://www.themilitant.com
    Pathfinder Press:
    http://www.pathfinderpress.com
    Granma International:
    http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob W" <rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 1:19 PM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] derange perfectionism: an historical perspective


    Hi gang.
    I used the search function on the freelists site looking for "deranged 
perfection". (Thus picking up perfectionist, perfectionists and all other 
deviants, or is it derivations.)

    There were 61 emails with that phrase in them. Unfortunately they aren't in 
any particular order, so the rest of the data is based on a spot check of the 
emails.

    Kim seems to like the phrase best: having ten emails in the list before I 
quit counting.

    The earliest email I could find was from Karrey in 2006, and I list it 
below.

    Does this make me an official deranged perfectionist?
    Bob

    -----
    [bksvol-discuss] Re: NY Times Best Seller List
    a.. From: Carrie Karnos <ckarnos@xxxxxxxxx>
    b.. To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    c.. Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 05:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
    For those people who are newbies in the discussion group, someone referred 
to
    the Bookshare volunteers as 'deranged perfectionists' a long while ago, and
    there was a general concensus that that's a good way to describe us. Clearly
    Evan fits right in with this group! :-)

    Carrie

    Evan Reese <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        Deranged perfectionist, you say?  I know the feeling.  The first book I
    validated, I read right through it - I would have done so anyway, as it was
    part of a series that I wanted to continue - and corrected every error I 
could.
    But, alas, I am not a professional proofreader, so when the book is approved
    and put in the collection, what to my amazement should appear a typo in the
    long synopsis for all to see!  It wasn't my error, as I hadn't scanned the
    book, but I had read the dust jacket info from which the synopsis was taken,
    and thought I had fixed everything.  I could have screamed.  I think I 
actually
    might have, I don't remember for sure now, but I wouldn't be surprised if I
    actually did.

    Life is hard for perfectionists.


    To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
    bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.





----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No virus found in this message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
    Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3832 - Release Date: 08/13/11


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3832 - Release Date: 08/13/11

Other related posts: