OK, I formally DELURK. Liz Halperin here, who comes and goes on this list. Been lurking awhile and hope to mostly keep my mouth shut due to time. Over 100 posts per day from here! Many I don't even read. About using a larger font for children's books. I can't figure out how it will make any difference as long as you use the size difference for headings. I am low vision/very hard of hearing and use VERY large print and braille, no audio whatsoever. Because of this, I've been tracking the daisy XML files and catching bugs, also braille. The bugs have already been fixed or on the list to be done. I proofread visually in HUGE size. If you start with a larger font on the proof, say 16, then up it to 20 on the headings, *it won't make any difference.* We've turned in with base fonts in size 10 and 12, no difference. Turned in with Times New Roman, a serifed (curlicued) font, that's difficult for me to read, especially the italics form. I switch, proof, and submit in Arial (sans serif--no curlicues, the most common font with low vision people) and no difference. The conversion tool always turns out the same thing. If you are listening (NOT as a proofer, just a regular member reader), you probably don't care what is the specific font and size except to maneuver around headings. If you are reading braille (all my entertainment reading) it doesn't make any difference at all on a notetaker. On PC with JAWS or WindowEyes and braille display, you can turn on "all attributes" and find out, but why bother? In XML, which can be opened and used for large print reading, it comes up as a standardized smallish font, sans serif, then the large print reader can play with it: actual PC settings changes, ZoomText, web-based changes, or reading through Kurzweil or OpenBook to get preferred font, size, and color combos, or other methods. So.... End point: as someone who has looked closely at the XML files (and seen those italics that run together, leading to braille italics that run together, and reported all this to engineering for investigation, and yup, were bugs to be fixed), I honestly don't see the point in enlarging the font of children's books. Just get those 4 point differences in headings for the audio and XML folks. Liz, who is still slowly doing volunteer books in addition to being a paid sub-contractor--and today donated those volunteer credits when Pavi gets to it Liz Halperin and guide dog Aziza Portland, OR lizzers@xxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Maples Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:31 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: formatting print for children's books Yes, Bob, that is one thing I left out that I meant to include. There should be a difference of 4 between the size of the text and the chapter headings. So, if you use 16 as the regular text that you would use 20 as the chapter heading. That makes it much more readable. At age 52 it is even better for me.*smile* ________________________________ From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 4:33 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: formatting print for children's books Hi Doug. I'm not sure about the answer to your question, but here's my guess. I think it would be just fine to use a different font and size. As long as the chapter headings are larger than the regular text. However, this is just a guess. Bob "We know the future will outlast all of us, but I believe that all of us will live on in the future we make," Senator Edward M. Kennedy ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Maples <mailto:WDMaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:23 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] formatting print for children's books I know that I am a newbie on the list and have only proofed five books, so far. Shelley and Jamie put out some children's books for me to start with, and that really helped me get my feet wet into proofing. One of the topics that first came up in my mind, and has since been a topic of the list, is what font and size to use. Generally, the rule has been Times New Roman 12 for the text and 16 for chapter headings. The children's books I have gotten have been scanned at a larger font and I really like it. It is much easier for children who are reading the text on the screen to have a larger font -- about 16. The books are so short, that it is really not a problem. They may also be easier to read with a font like Arial. That would also help Daisy readers. What do you think about this for kids books? -- Doug To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.