[bksvol-discuss] Re: so no fuss about to much traffic.
- From: "gwen tweedy" <gstweedy@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:03:28 -0500
Oh yeah, that does make sense I didn't think of that thanks so much, the reason
was I even mentioned it was in case of the to much traffic upon reflection,
what you have said makes sense as well thanks again.
Sometimes we need others to help us see different points thanks a million to
all who help me do that.
I can be one who can jump the gun, so to speak and have thought I have fully
thought through something, when in fact, there is more to the story or more
that Gwen needs to reconsider and things, thanks all, for helping me grow in
this area one day I'm planning to get better at thinking fully before I speak
fully.
Gwen
----- Original Message -----
From: Jamie Yates, CPhT
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:33 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: so no fuss about to much traffic.
The only problem with only telling the proofreader about the book that is
being scanned is then someone else might not know it's being scanned and they
may be working on it too, and duplicating efforts. Yes, you should check the
being scanned list, but not everyone always (I'm guilty of this from time to
time) does.
Or another person may have it almost scanned and then they could say to the
scanner, hey I've already got this almost done, please don't scan it.
--
Jamie in Michigan
Currently Reading: The BoneMan's Daughters by Ted Dekker
Earn cash for answering trivia questions every 3 hours:
http://instantcashsweepstakes.com/invitations/ref_link/49497
See everything I've read this year at: www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html
Other related posts:
