[bksvol-discuss] Re: teaching meditation to children
- From: "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:09:44 -0400
Elizabeth,
I agree with you regarding more detailed information on the book. The only
way to find out back comments and to figure out who the original submitter
(if she should choose to identify herself) is to release the book and
immediately go and pick it up. Before you can download, there are the
comments and the info one needs. It is annoying, to say the least.
Pratik
Pratik Patel
Managing Director
CUNYAssistive Technology Services
The City University of New York
ppatel@xxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 9:12 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] teaching meditation to children
My name is listed as part of the validating stream of Teaching Meditation
to Children. Something is going on and I am unable to understand the
cryptic note. Something about copyright.
By the way, on the subject of cryptic notes. What gives? Surely a bit
more transparency in the character of the mysteriously cryptic notes is in
order in general and particularly on the step 2 page. For one thing, once
a book is downloaded by a volunteer, would it be possible to transfer those
beginning notes to thename of the book currently being worked on so I can
still see the original submitter and book history? And what about making
those notes actually say things folks can understand and using long
descriptive sentences. That way, we volunteers can support each other in
getting issues resolved and know who to speak to about resolving what.
An example is my validating of Teaching ...
Another example is my validating Folktales of the British Isles.
Fortunately, I remember that Kenneth Cross submitted it. So I know who to
write to. I can tell him for example that the scan is beautiful on all
counts except the dates. i can pretty much figure those out by context and
am doing so. The errors seem to be i for 1 and o for 0 so far and
sometimes 0 for 1 as in 0887 which by context is clearly meant to be 1887.
Forgive me for long ranting posts. Longer notes would help. Even short
ones I can understand are welcome.
E.
Other related posts:
