[bksvol-discuss] Re: the page number issue
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:44:47 -0500
Kelly, to be perfectly honest with you, the only complaints I hear in
the fields is of Bookshare books being of lesser quality than other
repositories.
Granted a lot of these complaints are not completely justified, but we
can help by ever improving the quality of our output.
I have access to some other volunteer-scan-based repository, and have
compared quality of several hundred titles. Unfortunately the other
repository enjoy a 3 over 2 ratio of titles in which accuracy is greater
than Bookshare.
No big deal, but this points to the fact that we can do even better than
what we do now.
G.
Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone: (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html
"Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/15/2004 12:26 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] the page number issue
Guido,
I'll bet there are paying customers who would be unhappy to learn that
perfectly complete books were rejected due to a quirk in page-numbering.
However, knowing that you're more reasonable than you appear, I suppose
you
probably just did this because you know Dave is here and used it as an
example to spur further excellence. I only hope you've stirred up as much
excellence as you have contention, you book-nuking instigator! <lol>
Kellie
Other related posts:
