Patricia,
I did my dissertation on The Clients' Experiences of Family Constellations in
Psychological Healing. If you would like any of my references etc I'd be happy
to share.
Michaelene
"When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be." Lao Tzu
On Mar 4, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Patricia Robertson pkrobertson22@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions Sheila. It is Hellinger’s departure from
others in family group work that I resonate with so strongly - much like many
others. I will be in LA for Stephan Hauser’s work next week (can’t wait) and
experienced it as well in Bernried the past three years.
Thank you Cecilia for your suggestions. I have Ursula’s book In My Mind’s Eye
and didn’t realize she had another book available. I look forward to
exploring it. I suspected I would need to look more deeply at Satir’s family
sculptures to locate familiarities, however, I have not looked into Moreno.
Thank you for all suggestions and I would appreciate any further ideas for
other resources.
I believe Albrecht Mahr is coming out with a book in a few months and
wondered if anyone knows whether it will be available in English?
I so appreciate this community for its generosity of spirit!
Warm regards,
Patricia
On Mar 4, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Cecilia Altieri cecilia.altieri@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Patricia!
I can recommend you Ursula Franke's book "the river never looks back". That
is her Doctoral thesis on systemic constellations. There is plenty of
information there of the background of this work.
You might also want to take a look at the work of Jackob Moreno
(psychodrama) Virginia Satir with her "family sculptures", in between
others...
I'm abroad now, but next week I will be happy to help if you need more
resources. Let me know.
Ursula's book is very well explained and has loads of information on this
matter.
Best wishes,
Cecilia Altieri.
Sent with ❤️ from my iPhone
On 4 mar 2016, at 12:20, Patricia Robertson pkrobertson22@xxxxxxxxx
[ConstellationTalk] <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello to the Systemic Constellation community,
I have been researching the ancestry of Bert Hellinger’s Family
Constellations and looking at the context in which the work developed. It
felt like an appropriate thing to do in my doctoral studies as I have been
a genealogist since childhood and now I am working with client’s as a body
focused systemic constellation facilitator. I want to understand the long
ancestral line behind Hellinger’s Family Constellation. Honouring the
ancestors is integral to my work and has been a lifetime practice for me.
The short version of my question is to anyone with deep roots in the
development of Hellinger’s Family Constellation work: Was the early work on
Family Constellation by Walter Toman in 1961 and the Family Systems Theory
of Murray Bowen in 1976 influential in Hellinger’s work?
The longer version:
At the back of Love’s Hidden Symmetry: What Makes Love Work in
Relationships (pp. 327-330), Hellinger with Weber and Beaumont list many of
the major influences in the work of Hellinger and the development of family
constellations. Included on the list are influences such as Martin
Heidegger and Richard Wagner, the complete works of Freud, and the Zulu
peoples of South Africa, from whom he gained the “awareness of the
relativity of many cultural values,” “perceiving systems in relationships,”
“human commonality underlying cultural diversity,” ritual as “common human
experiences,” “the goodness of cultural and human variety,” and “the
validity of doing things in different ways” (pp. 327-328). From the field
of psychoanalysis influences mentioned are the group dynamics and
psychoanalysis of Primal Therapy, Gestalt Therapy, Transactional Analysis
of Eric Berne; the Family Therapy and Family Reconstruction of Virginia
Satir; whose work was greatly influential for the development of the
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) of Richard Bandler and John Grinder,
also an influence, the invisible bonds of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, the
hierarchy of families of Jay Haley; Hypnotherapy of Milton Erickson,
Provocative Therapy of Frank Farrelly, the Holding Therapy of Irena Precop,
and others (pp. 327-330).
Walter Toman and Murray Bowen are not mentioned as influences. I do not
come out of a background in psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, or psychology,
rather my work flows through peacebuilding and conflict analysis and
management in the world, and I’m interested in the work of Albrecht Mahr,
Hellinger, and others using systemic constellations in peacebuilding.
Since training in Hellinger’s Family Constellations in 2011, I have never
heard anyone mention the Family Constellation work of Walter Toman in 1961
as an Associate Professor of Psychology at Brandeis University. I have his
book on Family Constellation: Theory and Practice of a Psychological Game,
published by Springer Publishing Company in New York. His book includes a
great amount of information on family dynamics including 8 sibling
positions, 64 relationships with parents, portraits of family
constellations, intermediary sibling positions, and other symbolic notation
and quantitative treatment of “major aspects of family constellation.”
Toman states that he spells out how all individuals will recognize
themselves, their families and friends in the book, including relationships
and conflicts, and how we do think of these things, however, it tends to be
done “tacitly, implicitly, and without much order.”
While his work does take a different direction and emphasis on sibling
order in relationship, it does not seem totally unrelated to Hellinger’s
work either.
Toman’s work has been revisited many times over the years with American and
German editions. Toman, Walter. (Fall/Winter 1994). Family constellation
theory revisited: Part 1. Family Systems. Georgetown Family Center. Dept of
Psych. University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. (4th American edition and
4th and 5th German editions). (Publication years 1968, 1977, 1978, 1979,
1988a, 1989b, 1991a).
My assumption is that Toman’s Family Constellation work was available in
Germany during the development of Hellinger’s principles.
As well, I am also looking at the pioneering work on Family Systems Theory
of Murray Bowen (1976) and others such as Assagioli (1972) and Framo
(1982). Bowen developed the Family Diagram or early genogram expanded upon
by McGoldrick and Gerson in 1985.
Kerr, Michael E. (2000), (One family’s story: A primer on Bowen theory. The
Bowen Center for the Study of the Family), a long-time colleague of Bowens,
describes the Family Diagram developed by Murray Bowen and how it
“symbolizes a living organism, the multigenerational family emotional
system. More than any other symbol, the diagram announces the necessity to
shift paradigms, to move beyond an individual cause-and-effect model to a
multiperson systems model in understanding human behavior. The diagram
represents much more than genealogy; it represents the profound emotional
connections between the generations. People are born and die, but a
family’s past lives in the present.” “Diagrams are read chronologically
from left to right: the oldest child in a family appears furthest to the
left. Males are represented by squares, females by circles. When
information about people’s lives is collected, added to the basic diagram,
and thought about, one’s own life takes on a new understanding and meaning.”
On the Bowen Center website (http://www.thebowencenter.org/theory/), it
states that Murray Bowen, the psychiatrist who pioneered family systems
theory, which includes the 8 interlocking concepts listed below, is “a
theory of human behavior that views the family as an emotional unit and
uses systems thinking to describe the complex interactions in the unit. It
is the nature of a family that its members are intensely connected
emotionally. Often people feel distant or disconnected from their families,
but this is more feeling than fact. Families so profoundly affect their
member’s thoughts, feelings, and actions that it often seems as if people
are living under the same “emotional skin.” People solicit each other’s
attention, approval, and support and react to each other’s needs,
expectations, and upsets. The connectedness and reactivity make the
functioning of family members interdependent. A change in one person’s
functioning is predictably followed by reciprocal changes in the
functioning of others. Families differ somewhat in the degree of
interdependence, but it is always present to some degree” (para. 2).
Anxiety spreads “infectiously” among family members, and the family member
that “does the most accommodating literally “absorbs” system anxiety and
thus is the family member most vulnerable to problems such as depression,
alcoholism, affairs, or physical illness” (para. 3).
Bowen Family Systems Theory (8 features):
1) Triangles ( Fusion and distancing, Adequate and inadequate spouse)
2) Differentiation of Self (Fusion or differentiation, Solid self or
pseudo self, Intellectual and emotional functioning)
3) Nuclear Family Emotional Process ( Maternal conflict, Inadequate or
over adequate spouses, Emotional divorce)
4) Family Projection Process (Child focus or triangle child, Identified
or designated patient,
5) Multi Generational Transmission Processes (Compounding
effects,Schizophrenia)
6) Sibling Position (Toman’a Family Constellation. Based on the
publication of Walter Toman’s first edition of Family Constellation: It’s
Effect on Personality and Social Behavior, published in 1961)
7) Emotional Cutoff (Family of Origin)
8) Emotional Processes in Society (Societal Regression)
It seems to me that Toman’s and Bowen’s work seem to show up as very
influential in Hellinger’s Family Constellations. Toman reveals that the
ancestral lines of his work are Freud, Adler, and Jung. Can anyone
elaborate on whether Walter Toman’s and Murray Bowen’s work and principles
were influential in the development of Orders of Family in Hellinger’s
phenomenological practice of Family Constellations that are revealed within
the greater system of The Knowing Field?
Is there any acknowledgement of this earlier work? I also wondered if part
of the reason Hellinger did not copyright his way of working with Family
Constellations is because Family Constellation already existed before he
used the label? I have heard that the reason is because he wanted Family
Constellations to expand and evolve with each new facilitator as they added
their own background and experience to the work. Any thoughts to share?
Kind regards,
Patricia
Peaceful Possibilities Consulting
MA(CAM), BA(Hon), BCom, CPA, CMA
Student, Doctor of Social Sciences, Royal Roads University
Integrative Wellness Practitioner, Educator, &
Body Focused Systemic Constellation Facilitator
403-474-0452
patricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.peacefulpossibilities.ca
