Hi again,
so much for mailing while very tired.
First paragraph, 2nd sentence I meant rules that refer to a professional who
works in different capacities and/or one who mixes professional & private
lives...
take care,
Libby S.
----- Original Message -----
From: libby shapiro
To: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [ConstellationTalk] Dual relationships
Hi Libby Nottle,
the dual relationships one refers to here in the states are ones that mix
professional and private lives, and I am thinking it is similar in Australia-
??? Or do the rules there refer to a professional who works in different
capacities?
If it is the same as here, then working with someone as a therapist and then
as a constellations facilitator, another kind of helping professional - albeit
one that seeks to be without intention- would not really be a dual role. In
both capacities you are working with your client as a client, so I don't
understand why the Australian Psychological Society would take issue with that.
Or maybe it's about finding words, terms, that suit the APS. In some articles
and/or books on Family Constellations as developed by Hellinger, I've seen the
author/s refer to the 'therapist' who is leading the constellation. Usually the
authors who use the term are psychotherapists. Whether one is a psychotherapist
or not, I don't feel therapist is the term that rings true for facilitating
constellations, but if it will appease the APS I would consider using it.
That's what comes to mind to me.
Otherwise, greetings to you from a Libby who facilitates in New York. (And in
the US, Dan Cohen, more congrats to you for finishing your Master's Degree.)
Libby Shapiro
----- Original Message -----
From: Libby Nottle
To: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: [ConstellationTalk] Dual relationships
Hi everyone,
I work in private practice and run constallations workshops with Chris
Walsh. At times, with consideration for timing, potential impact on our
relationship, appropriateness etc I encourage my private clients to attend
workshops. If they attend I am have a dual relatonship with them - as therapist
and facilitator. Technically I am in contravention of the Code of Ethics of the
professional organisation to which I belong - the Australian Psychological
Society:
"Members must avoid dual relationships that could impair their
professional judgement or increase the risk of exploitation. "
I could just not advertise our workshops to my clients. Just my colleagues.
Yet often a workshop is an extension of work that we have already begun 1:1.
And there would be advantages to our ongoing work for me to witness any
constellation that a client sets up. Working with a colleague in workshops
there is at least a professional witness familiar with the work to provide
second opinion on what happens.
I am curious whether other people have considered this issue and how they
manage it.
Any thoughts?
Libby Nottle
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ConstellationTalk/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ConstellationTalk-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.