Sorry for the stray email, everyone. It was meant for a colleague in a
different world.
Ed
_____
From: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Levy
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:58 AM
To: ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ConstellationTalk] Article about Constellations in an Israeli
magazine
Hi Sue,
Yup, no www.
I just got back from voting. Boy, did that feel good.
_____
From: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ConstellationTalk@ ;<mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Irene Taitson
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:18 PM
To: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ConstellationTalk] Article about Constellations in an Israeli
magazine
Hi, Stella,
I always give people who have done constellations my telephone number and
email address in case they
have an after constellation reaction, and insist they get in touch with me
in case of need. On a few occasions
patients have have had individual sessions afterwards, but these are rare.
And to some I have prescribed Bach Flower
Remedies to help them go through post constellations reactions. This has
even been necessary with a man who
had very strong reactions after being the representative of a man's ancestor
in a constellation. That ancestor, a slave,
had been brutally murdered. It is interesting to note, though, that it
appears that as I get more experienced after constellation
reactions are less frequent, but this may be just coincidence.
With regards,
Irene Taitson
----- Original Message -----
From: stellaconsnoit
To: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 9:20 AM
Subject: [ConstellationTalk] Re: Article about Constellations in an Israeli
magazine
Good evening,
This is an interesting topic, and Mr Cohen, I was very impressed with
your 2006 article in the Counseling and Therapy for Couples and
Families, which led to my discovery of this communication group.
I, too, have ethical concerns about family constellation work and
perhaps my concerns can be addressed in dialogue with practitioners
who have had experience in this modality. The literature is scarce
and what is available is generated by those already well-versed in
the therapeutic potential of the work. For example, there is very
little mention on potential effects on participants.
In a recent family constellation workshop, a participant experienced
such low blood pressure that he lost the sense of hearing
(temporarily, as it was restored when he sat on the ground). Another
had what appeared to be a panic attack. She was very frightened at
the time and now very critical of the therapy. After care, per
Hellinger, was non-existent.
I am interested in the body's response and know that in situations of
heightened emotion or tension, it is fairly normal for some people to
feel light-headed, nauseated or faint. This relates to normal nervous
system function and is seen readily in those who react to the sight
of blood or needles. In line-formation in military parades, those
standing stock-still with knees straightened sometimes keel over and
the embarassing footage is captured on amateur video.
So, with my limited experience in constellation participation, what
kind of physiological experiences are a typical occurence and how do
they fit into the theory? There is a safety issue here...
I look forward to a reply,
Stella.
--- In ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "Toni McLean" <toni@...>
wrote:
the
Hi Dan / Ayelet,
I'm a psychotherapist who places a great deal of importance on the
theoretical underpinnings of any modality, however, I much prefer
concept of "practice-based evidence" rather than "evidence-basedpractice".
The first time I heard the former phrase, it made much more senseto me than
the more familiar latter one, which somehow seems to me to assumethat the
inner nature / heart / mind / lived experience of each one of us isI see
sufficiently similar to determine just how we should be "treated".
evidence-based practice as offering at best a rough starting pointor
framework when beginning work with a client, and definitely not assomething
to adhere to. I think FC can definitely offer practice-basedevidence.
net.au> net.au>
Regards
Toni
Toni McLean
Think Twice!
Counselling and Programs for individuals and couples
with high level conflict or abuse in their relationships
0409 599 887
info@...
www.thinktwiceprogram.net
toni@...
www.tonimclean.net.au
admin@...
www.dvforum.net.au
<http://www.dvforum. ;<http://www.dvforum. ;<http://www.dvforum.net.au>
yahoogroups.com
_____
From: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ConstellationTalk@ ;<mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Booth
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008 12:54 AMyahoogroups.com
To: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [ConstellationTalk] Article about Constellations in anIsraeli
magazinedissertation.
Ayelet - I dealt with these criticisms in great detail in my
Here is a excerpt of the discussion that may help you formulate aresponse.
There is plenty more. Write me at Dan@HiddenSolution.therapies,
<mailto:Dan%40HiddenSolution.com> com to read the full
text. Dan
Many psychologists warn against the growing popularity of fringe
those that rely on the clinician's intuition and experience ratherthan
research evidence. They claim that unsanctioned approaches threatenthe
scientific foundations of clinical psychology.psychology is
The gulf between Family Constellations and evidenced based
substantial. The Constellation approach explicitly and purposefullyomits
much of what evidence based practice in psychology (EBPP) includesand
conversely, ventures into territory that cognitive, behavioral andSchultz
psychodynamic therapies explicitly avoid.
Standard textbooks in psychology present a unified historiography.
and Schultz (1992) asserted that psychology as an independentformal field
of study did not emerge as a distinct entity until the last quarterof the
19th century when "speculating, intuiting and generalizing" gaveway to the
rigors of "carefully controlled observation and experimentation tostudy the
human mind" (p. 4). This application of precise and objectivemethodologies
led to the development of tools and techniques that refined "notonly the
questions psychologists asked, but also the answers they obtained"(p. 4).
of
To be comprehended, the answers obtained must fit inside the frame
reference of the questions asked. Academic/laboratory/clinicalpsychology
studies mind and behavior using a positivistic, reductionistmethodology.
The questions asked must be limited to what can be learned fromcontrolled
experimentation.mechanistic
The prominent arc of experimental psychology has been to apply
principles to the questions of human behavior. It follows along thelines
of Galileo's (1623) 17th century assertion, "I do not believe thatthere
exists anything in external bodies.but size, shape, quantity, andmotion."
During the 20th century two dominant trends, both based on theprinciples of
positivistic reductionism, emerged in psychological research. Thefirst was
the assumption that improving knowledge of human behavior is afunction of
improved data collection and analysis. The second is thatpsychiatric
illnesses can be explained and treated as a function of brainchemistry.
standard
Contemporary clinical psychology's thirst for data creates a dual
for whether an approach receives broad acceptance. In the new age ofmethods
science, "curing the sick is not enough, one must cure them with
accepted by the community" (Ellenberger, 1970, p. 57). It is notsimply
whether clients respond favorably, but also whether these resultscan be
confirmed in controlled studies. Again, the questions asked serveto limit
the answer received.integration of
Family Constellations emerged from other historic trends, an
existential-phenomenology, family systems theory, and indigenoushealing
practices. They draw from non-conceptual intuitive responses thatare
inconsistent with the dominant protocols of psychology whichspecifically
eliminate "speculating, intuiting and generalizing" in favorof "carefully
controlled observation and experimentation to study the human mind"(D.P.
Schultz & S.E. Schultz, 1992, p. 4). Scientific psychology, bylimiting its
scope to facts that can be discerned through carefully controlledmetaphoric, or
observations and experimentation, has ceded the realm of personal
metaphysics to those who delve in subjective, pragmatic,
presentational languages.40yahoogroups.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%
yahoogroups.com40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ConstellationTalk@ ;<mailto:ConstellationTalk%
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ayeletdepIsraeli
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:37 AM
To: ConstellationTalk@ <mailto:ConstellationTalk%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ConstellationTalk] Article about Constellations in an
magazinethe
Hello Every body
I Recently wrote for an online Israeli Group Magazine an article
about Constellations. As part of the effort to share this work with
as many people as possible in Israel, I shared my experience with
work as a participant and as a facilitator.phenomenon.
I got some inquiries and some feedbacks. One of them was very
critical.
It was written by a Family Psychotherpaist who never experienced
Constellations, but preceived my enthusiasm as a new age
She was affended by the fact that I wrote that this is the mostI
cutting edge and popular group work in Europe (actually in my reply
will add Asia and US as well..is it too vain? not realistic?)hear
She also red on the internet that the founder of this work is a
contreversial figure..a fact that just added to her negative view.
I just finished writing my reply to this lady and would love to
any comments regarding this kind of dialog.
Thank you
Ayelet