[ddots-l] Re: Audio Interface Issue with 64 bit Sonar

  • From: Justin Kauflin <justin.kauflin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:32:36 -0400

Yeah, pretty much what I thought.  Just another reason I can't wait to afford 
an upgrade to the system.

Justin
On Sep 24, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Bryan Smart wrote:

> I was just playing with one of those last week on Windows 7 64-bit, and I 
> couldn't get it to work right, either. Then, I tried the original US144 (not 
> MK II), on a customer's Win 7 64-bit system, and it worked, though it 
> glitched if latency was low at all. In this case, the updated product seems 
> to operate worse. Not that the US144 was trouble free on XP.
> 
> I've only been hearing about their low-end stuff lately. I haven't played 
> with a US2000, for example. The low-end stuff definitely has problems. 
> Certainly there is better for the same money.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Justin Kauflin
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:58 AM
> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ddots-l] Audio Interface Issue with 64 bit Sonar
> 
> Hey,
>     I know you all must love questions about audio interfaces and why there 
> creating unwanted noise and what not.  Please forgive me for this post, but 
> I'm stumped right now.
>     I'm using a Tascam US122MKII interface with Windows 7 64 bit.  I've been 
> using it with no problems with the 32 bit version of Sonar 8.5.3 with the 
> latest CakeTalking scripts.  I've been using it with the ASIO drivers and 
> everything's been sounding great.
>     When I installed the 64 bit version of Sonar, I've been getting those 
> pops and clicks that occur when the buffer settings are too low.  I tried 
> switching it to a higher buffer with the ASIO drivers, and I've switched to 
> WDM drivers and have upped the buffer there as well and haven't been able to 
> rid myself of those terrible clicks.
>     I've also checked the drivers that I downloaded from Tascam and they are 
> supposedly 64 bit drivers.
>     Does anybody have any ideas why this might be?  I'd really love to check 
> out how well Sonar runs in 64 bit, but so far can't really appreciate it as 
> its unusable right now.
> 
> Thanks a lot for any advice.
> 
> JustinPLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> unsubscribe
> For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately 
> following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject?q or send a message, to 
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq
> 
> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> unsubscribe
> For other list commands such as vacation mode,
> click on the immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
> send a message, to
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> faq
> 
> 

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

Other related posts: