[ddots-l] Re: Normalizing Clips
- From: "Dave Carlson" <dgcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:17:12 -0700
If I have to I will, but I've got several clips scattered throughout the over
50 clips so it would be grinding work.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: neville
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 07:27
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Normalizing Clips
Why not try using the gain control on the clips you want to be louder? Then
after you get them to the level you want you can use a little compression.
May the peace of God that passes all understanding guard your heart and mind
in Christ Jesus
God Bless You!
email neville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website
http://www.nevillepeter.com
phone number 407-222-4488
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dave Carlson
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:31 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Normalizing Clips
Brian,
Thanks, I did think that I needed to keep the clips separate, but wanted to
be sure. The normalize isn't getting some of these clips even close to each
other in overall listening volume, so I'm wondering if I should use some other
tools like removing dc offset -- what does that do, actually?
I also posted a question on another list about needing to trim all my clips
so that there were no remnants of other clips being used in the overall
processing of levels?
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: Bryan Smart
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 16:14
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Normalizing Clips
Wen you select a track and run normalize, it should normalize each of the
clips separately.
Once you use bounce to clips, all the clips become one large clip, and so
the normalize command would only boost that one clip with enough gain so that
its loudest area wouldn't clip.
Therefore, I think that you should load each of the files on to one track,
leave them as individual clips, and run normalize on the complete track. There
really isn't a need for you to use bounce to clips at all in this scenario.
Bryan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dave Carlson
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 11:08 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Normalizing Clips
Hello Audio Experts,
Using Sonar 7 and CT. I've got about 50 clips that I've collected and
first used fade -in and fade-out processing, that I want to eventually have all
played in a continuous sequence on a single track. However the overall volume
levels are differnt, since these all come from different CDs and different
masterings. I'd like them all to be fairly close to each other in volume.
Is there a difference in these three scenarios:
1. 50 clips, each on 50 tracks, and compressing or normalizing them after
selecting all the tracks?
- or -
2. 50 clips, all end-to-end on a single track, normalizing or compressing
them after selecting the entire track?
- or -
3. Bounce all clips to a single track as a single clip, and then
normalizing or compressing the track?
What's the difference or benefits to each? Keep in mind that I want to
retain the fade-in and fade-out.
Dave
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.49/2293 - Release Date: 08/10/09
06:10:00
Other related posts:
