[ddots-l] Re: sibelious and notation

  • From: "Dave Carlson" <dgcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:20:08 -0700

Omar,

One other point: there is no quantization in Sibelius. There are plug-ins that 
perform similar functions to clean up MIDI files. Quantization (as far as my 
experience leads) is in Sonar and Cakewalk.

Dave

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Omar Binno 
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 12:46 PM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sibelious and notation


  I do use quantization. That being the case: would that solve this issue?

  Thanks.

  Omar Binno

  www.omarbinno.com
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Dave Carlson 
    To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 3:24 PM
    Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sibelious and notation


    Omar,

    If you don't use quantization or other automations you'll need to play that 
entire piece without the sustain pedal. All the sustain pedals does is send 
MIDI messages to hold and then release that note, which can be any duration.

    Each note needs to be played as legato as you possibly can, to the length 
you want to capture. Hold that 8th note for exactly half as long as a quarter 
note, etc. The better you do this, the less post-processing you'll need to do.

    Dave

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Omar Binno 
      To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 9:37 AM
      Subject: [ddots-l] sibelious and notation


      Okay, so I was reading the sonar tutorials on staff notation, and it's 
telling me that I need to play notes without sustain if I want to have accurate 
note durations for printing. My question is; if I were to print the music out 
through sibelious, would I still have that problem? I don't really feel like 
re-recording an entire song from scratch.

      Thanks.

      Omar Binno

      www.omarbinno.com

Other related posts: