By Sarah Magliocco
Sarah Magliocco is a journalist and content creator.
Sarah Magliocco explores why nearly all digital voice assistants are
programmed with female voices and names, and what this says about gender
bias.
Hey Siri! Why do nearly all digital voice assistants have female voices and
names?
It seems like an innocent enough question, one that we would assume has an
answer rooted in science - something along the lines of vocal pitch
preference or pattern but it was a question that spawned an online
conversation about gender bias, gender roles, and over-thinking when posed
by The Sleepover Club podcasters Ione Gamble and Halima Jibril.
Ione, author and founding editor of digital publication Polyester, and
writer and community editor Halima set TikTok ablaze with their examination
of the topic, with their video breakdown of the topic racking up a quarter
of a million views.
A number of studies and articles have already scrutinised the link between
female AI voices and the perpetuation of sexist stereotypes, as Siri, Alexa
, Microsoft's Cortana, and Google Assistant have all had feminine voices as
the default.
The feminine default
While all digital assistants have received updates since their conception,
with a range of different voices now available in the settings options, for
most, the first time you plug it in it will be a feminine voice responding
to your commands.
When you look for weather updates, directions, or a change of radio station,
a female-presenting voice will take care of the request without complaint.
Data from Statista estimates that in 2022, 6.4 billion people globally are
using voice-activated intelligence, whether it is via smartphones, in-car
GPS systems, or speaker systems.
With such a huge portion of our worlds population engaging with AI
assistants, it is worth examining how their presentation can impact how we
see them and interact with them, and what knock-on effect it has, if any, in
our day-to-day lives.
If all voice assistants are female, does that lead us to revert to making
assumptions about women that hundreds of years of progress have already
refuted and worked to overturn? If we place only female presenting tech in
this subservient role, can that lead people to have less respect for the
female voice when it emerges from a larynx instead of a speaker?
AI equality
According to a much-discussed study by UNESCO, voice assistants with female
voices have the power to perpetuate harmful stereotypes about
female-identifying individuals.
The report by UNESCO explained that companies staffed by "overwhelmingly
male engineering teams, have built AI systems that cause their feminised
digital assistants to greet verbal abuse with catch-me-if-you-can
flirtation."
The title of the study, I'd blush if I could, is named after the response
Apple's Siri used to give when it received sexist abuse from users.
Siri has been given some self-respect in recent years, as its default
response to being called hateful names is now "I wont respond to that" go
Siri, give them the virtual cold shoulder but many argue there is still a
way to go when it comes to figuring out how best to apply societys
standards of gender equality to AI.
"Because the speech of most voice assistants is female, it sends a signal
that women are... docile helpers, available at the touch of a button or with
a blunt voice command like 'hey' or 'OK'. The assistant holds no power of
agency beyond what the commander asks of it. It honours commands and
responds to queries regardless of their tone or hostility," says the study.
Sexy Sally & Barking Bob
The history of feminine voices and their roles in tech assisting goes back
much further than Amazon or Apple's beginnings. Since the 1950s, the
development of various aircraft for the US military saw fighter crafts begin
to get fitted with voice command systems, which warned pilots of issues and
guided them to make various decisions.
One such system, voiced by singer and actor Joan Elms, was nicknamed 'Sexy
Sally', while a later system was informally dubbed 'B*tching Betty'. A
masculine equivalent featured in later voice systems is called 'Barking Bob'
by some pilots.
The researchers believed that a womans voice was more likely to get the
attention of the predominantly male pilots over the din of direct
communication radio frequencies. This has been disproven in various studies
throughout the 2000s, but companies gathered a database of majority female
voice samples for use in such systems over the decades.
Vocal Fry
Women were previously made to hold certain roles and occupations in society,
and generations of breaking gender biases have gone into reshaping our world
to be a more equal one (though we are not quite there yet).
While being a homemaker is a valid form of work in fact, the very
framework of our industrially motivated civilisation would collapse without
the unseen labour done by those who work in the home homemaking was
traditionally done by women and as such, stilted career prospects for women
before the modern age.
Because of this, roles such as telephone operations, receptionist work, and
assistant work were previously more often held by women than men, and a
feminine voice became what people were accustomed to when they thought about
helpful compliance - despite people of all gender identities having the
ability to deliver information effectively and in the neutral, light manner
that has become the preference for digital vocal work.
"It's much easier to find a female voice that everyone likes than a male
voice that everyone likes," the late Stanford communications professor
Clifford Nass, told CNN in 2011."Its a well-established phenomenon that the
human brain is developed to like female voices."
However, with the Google autofill for "women's voices is" being "annoying,"
that does not exactly hold up. Female radio hosts, podcasters, and even
celebrities like the Kardashians are frequently slated for their voices,
which may suggest that people only think they prefer feminine voices for
these roles because they are accustomed to them.
Man and machine
While the voices we hear coming out of our devices may be female-coded by
default, they are also deeply technological, with strange inflection,
pacing, and a stilted tone that lets us know we are speaking to a machine.
Perhaps this is to prevent people from becoming too frustrated when their
devices dont know exactly how to answer their questions or get something
wrong.
The slightly unnatural tone of the responses reminds us that we are dealing
with a technical issue, not a personal one. However, people still get
personal with their machines, judging by the fact that AI assistants are now
programmed with responses to abusive questions.
The issue was once that AI assistants had problems recognising and
challenging inappropriate behaviour. Now they can recognise it, but still do
not challenge it.
It could be lumped in with the worlds wider issue of glorifying violence
towards women, with games, films, and online incel communities reveling in
negative depictions of women. If you can degrade your female-voiced AI
assistant without retaliation, then does that instill the belief -
consciously or unconsciously - that the same actions can be perpetrated
toward women in reality?
We cant know this yet for sure as the concept is so new, but the data so
far confirms that these compliant female robot voices reinforce gender
stereotypes, and it is not necessarily because they act as digital servants
to the user, but because regardless of how they are asked, they will comply.
Gender neutral devices
This form of technology is all about communication, and people do not
respect their machines like they respect other people. Giving these
lesser-respected entities female voices has the potential to have a
significant cultural impact.
The UNESCO report argues that making the voices gender neutral and
programming them to properly deflect and discourage sexist abuse, or abuse
in general, can help to deter the increasing popularity of AI voice
assistants from having a negative impact.
These systems are designed to help us, and we are meant to boss them around,
and removing the gendered aspect from the devices can help to alleviate the
false stereotype that women are subservient, available to help at the touch
of a button, and unable to retaliate to abuse that the current default
voices may perpetuate.
RTÉ Technology.
===========================================================
The fb-exchange mailing list
Manage account,
List Page: https://www.freelists.org/list/fb-exchange
Archive: https://www.freelists.org/archive/fb-exchange
To unsubscribe: log onto the List page and select "Unsubscribe".
Administrative contact: insight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
===========================================================
