I agree with Ted.....
Edmund L. Gates
830-255-9595
On Jan 22, 2021, at 5:05 PM, JAMES MORGAN <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although the least-qualified to speak on the issue of academics, my personal
preference is to hopefully award a recipient on the cumulative sum of need,
merit and scholarship. I will go with the consensus of the group, however.
I’d suggest, 2.5 or 2.75, or higher. Theodore E. Bayer BQ ’77
On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Edward Retta
<eretta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks David,
Can we designate the money go to a cadet, BQ who actually gets off of
academic probation? You know, after she/he gets their grades back up?
Am serious here. I know several of us on this list can relate… this is a
fitting tribute to our class and our times there.
I never had to study in HS, and being whistle jock in the spring semester
almost killed me. Took me until spring '75 to get off of probation.
Count myself damn lucky that I didn’t miss a semester in 4 years.
By Zip year I was OK, 3.0+ and actually graduated first in my class in grad
school, many years later.
late bloomer, Queso
On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:07 PM, David Pointon <david.pointon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guys,
We are putting the final touches on establishing the scholarship
The one thing that is bugging me is the GPA requirement, exceeding the
average GPA of our class especially fish and pisshead years
I’d like to propose we don’t increase the requirement beyond the
foundations’s of 2.3 for a Sul Ross, or. 2.5 for a Rudder
It just seems to me a lot of money gets thrown at the 3.5 -4.0 crowd and
little to guys like the majority of us.
Last opine from me on this subject
dwp
Sent from my iPhone
