Hi Uipko, Thanks for the comparison data. Is the rowing bike higher (less aero) by any chance? I wonder how a python would compare to these 2 bikes, given similar dimensions and components. Steering a MBB does cost energy but python seems to cost much less than MBB with positive trail and shorter BB-pivot, 10%? Reducing load on the knees is another benefit of arm-assist. After a few months, I would recommend the simple method of pushing on the thighs to any rider who is comfortable going hands-free, since only limited power can be applied, and only as needed to overcome some changes in wind or elevation (variable assist). What to do with those free hands... :) Vi >________________________________ > From: Jürgen Mages <jmages@xxxxxx> >To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:42 PM >Subject: [python] Re: Arm-assist pedalling > > >That sums up my own experience with arm-assistance: Good for bursts - I guess >until the stored oxygen/atp in the arms muscles is consumed - but no >additional speed in the long run. The only advantage might be the arms/upper >body workout. > >Cheers, >Jürgen. > >On 22.02.2014 00:11, Uipko Berghuis wrote: >> Not python related. But my experience between thys rowing bike and m5 >> sp559 is that the sp559 is more efficient than the rowing bike. As I >> understood from others is that it's not the leg muscles but the >> lungs/heart that are the limiting factor. So for short bursts legs+arms >> could be better, on the long run legs alone are strong enough to burn >> all the fuel your body can provide. >> >> > >============================================================ > >This is the Python Mailinglist > >//www.freelists.org/list/python > >Listmaster: Jurgen Mages jmages@xxxxxx > >To unsubscribe send an empty mail to python-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field. > >============================================================ > > > >