Torben Scheel wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Dirk Bonne <dirk_bonne@xxxxxxxxxx> To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:03:01 +0100 Subject: [python] Re: frame flexibility
> Jürgen Mages wrote:
> > Hi Dirk,
> >
> > at first glance I would blame this on the 30x10x1 tubing.
>
> If it were only true! It is 30x10x1.5 :-)
>
> > Does Torben, who uses the same material has flexing?
>
> yes, please, test it out!
I have extensive "flexing" from the flevopivot mount to the rear frame clip-mounted), so I can't determine if anything else are flexing until that is fixed.
Already fixed that! ...unfortunatly :-(
seeing his weldings (good!). On my bike the rear fork (a pleonasm? The fork!) is the weakest point - I'm fixing that with 10*10*1 tubing from dropouts to seatmount.
I'm going to make a tube that fits the flevoaxel exactly in a lathe, and braze it in the rear frame, but maybe I can't
eliminate every last bit of flexing. I wonder if flevobike have the same problem - I used mild steel and the flevo way with enforcements plates : http://www.hpv-klub.dk/selvbygger/Flevoracer/e-fr09.gif - the holes in the rear frame are bound to be eliptical in time.
Cheers'
Torben