Ummmm....we HAVE to talk. This sounds impossible. Do you have any details? Where did you hear this from? From my standpoint you MUST have made a mistake somewhere! Gil On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Brian Lyons <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: Gil Winkler >>> To: torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:20 AM >>> Subject: [torontocbm] Re: Length of serial cable >>> >> > > Excuse me? Electrons in the states increased in size? >>> >> > Yes, I think this is related to global warming. > However the electrons in northern Canada have not increased in mass nearly > as much as the ones in southern US. > > Not sure about this thinnet wiring......where can I peruse the specs for >>> it? >>> >> > I saw a link posted a couple weeks ago. > It's a great source of info on the topic, maybe you missed it. > > http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=thinnet > > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Rick Towns <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> > I read that you can use networking cable for this purpose, but you have >>>>>> to make sure you're using thicknet wire as opposed to thinnet. Over the >>>>>> last >>>>>> 20 years, an interesting fact is that >>>>>electrons have increased in >>>>>> mass >>>>>> by 30% (at least in North American anyway) and as a result of friction, >>>>>> thinnet wiring is unable to support transport speeds above 110 baud. The >>>>>> resulting >>>>>heat does pose a fire hazard, therefore thicknet cabling >>>>>> is >>>>>> recommended. >>>>>> >>>>> > > YMMV. :) >>>>>> >>>>> > > Rick in Barrie >>>>>> >>>>> > > On 3-Apr-09, at 11:09 AM, Tom Luff wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> > > How long do you need your cable??? >>>>>> Standard IEC cable for the Floppy Disk Drives are about 3 feet, for >>>>>> printers they can be 6 feet but are a little larger in diameter due to >>>>>> the >>>>>> thicker wire. Thin wires loss signal strength over >>>>>greater distance. >>>>>> >>>>> > Cat 5 cable I think is alright. >>>>>> >>>>> > Tom L >>>>>> >>>>> > >