[wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
- From: Frank Yerrace <Frank.Yerrace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:07:42 +0000
Yes you are correct about WASAPI's IAudioClient::Initialize.
Jeff- just curious- when you reported the problems, how did you go about
reporting them, and approximately when?
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Pages
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:18 PM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
Doesn't the IAudioClient::Initialize function in WASAPI require in shared mode
that the sampling rate be the same as what the audio engine is set to, or in
exclusive mode be a rate that the hardware supports, so that the Windows SRC is
never invoked?
In any case, WASAPI isn't supported on XP, so the applications our customers
are using are unlikely to be using that API for a long time to come. What do we
tell them when they start complaining about capture artefacts on Windows 7?
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Larry Osterman
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2010 12:06 PM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
Sure - use WASAPI for capture - that will use the same resampler as is used for
output.
DSound uses the same resampler, but when capturing mono inputs, because DSound
is primarily a game API, it tunes the resampler for performance, not fidelity
(I don't know if there are knobs to make the DSound resampler operate at a
higher fidelity).
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Pages
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:47 PM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
The applications I've used include Cooledit and Adobe Audition, as well as a
spectrum analyser program I wrote which used the wave API. On XP I believe
capture always used the "best" converter regardless of API, and I don't see the
problem on that platform (all the converter artefacts are below -96dB).
Is there any way in Vista or Windows 7 to force it to use a better quality
converter on capture?
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Larry Osterman
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2010 11:29 AM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
What API are you using to capture? It's possible that you're using one of the
lower quality resamplers in the box (for instance if you're using the wave
APIs, I believe you'll use the ACM resampler which is basically the same
resampler used in XP).
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Pages
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:20 PM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Capture with USBAudio under Windows 7 noisy
Tim wrote:
>The purists might disagree, but it has been my experience that the
>Windows sample rate converter is pretty good for most purposes. How
>are you detecting the noise at 4 kHz? Are you injecting a pure signal
>and doing a spectrum analysis on the result?
While the render sampling rate converter in Windows 7 is very good, the capture
converter is a different matter entirely. It has conversion artefacts at about
-65dB on a pure tone. I first noticed this back when Vista was released and
tried reporting it a couple of times but got nowhere, and the problem has
persisted into Windows 7.
Jeff
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
Other related posts:
