Hello, Thank you for your reply. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Tim Roberts <timr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No. Both architectures work, and are likely to continue to work at > least through this decade. If you are comfortable with wavecyclic, I > say stick with it. It is my personal opinion that AVStream is cleaner, > but as you say, there will be a learning curve. That's not an > insignificant consideration. I'm just curious as to what you meant when you called AVStream cleaner than wavecyclic. Does this translate into something useful for the audio driver? Also, I'm not sure you can answer this, but which model is better documented wrt to audio? Again, thank you for your reply. >