User Tools

Site Tools


dmarc

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
dmarc [2020/12/13 17:25]
staff created
dmarc [2023/10/26 20:49]
staff
Line 3: Line 3:
 ===== Background ===== ===== Background =====
  
-[[https://dmarc.org/|DMARC]] is a standard used to prevent senders from using a From address without being properly authorized to do so. What this means for mailing list senders like FreeLists is that we can't use your address in the From: header -- this is the default and generally how mailing lists work -- for domains who have a DMARC policy that indicates mail should be rejected if it fails DMARC checks. +[[https://dmarc.org/|DMARC]] is a standard used to prevent senders from using a From address without being properly authorized to do so. What this means for mailing list senders like FreeLists is that we can't use your address in the ''From:'' header -- this is the default and generally how mailing lists work -- for domains who have a DMARC policy that indicates mail should be rejected if it fails DMARC checks. 
  
-DMARC puts FreeLists in a difficult position: We're essentially required to sign/authenticate mail we're sending on your behalf with SPF and DKIM to ensure deliverability, yet for ease of use we want to maintain the original From: header so subscribers know who sent the message. DMARC prevents the combination of these conditions.+DMARC puts FreeLists in a difficult position: We're essentially required to sign/authenticate mail we're sending on your behalf with SPF and DKIM to ensure deliverability, yet for ease of use we want to maintain the original ''From:'' header so subscribers know who sent the message. DMARC prevents the combination of these conditions.
  
-==== Official Remedies ====+===== Official Remedies =====
  
 DMARC itself offers some solutions:  DMARC itself offers some solutions: 
Line 13: Line 13:
 [[https://dmarc.org/wiki/FAQ#senders|I operate a mailing list and I want to interoperate with DMARC, what should I do?]] [[https://dmarc.org/wiki/FAQ#senders|I operate a mailing list and I want to interoperate with DMARC, what should I do?]]
  
-Section 3 off their guidance offers the only viable set of options -- we somehow have to replace the From: address with something else -- so that's what we'll discuss next. (Depending on your list's configuration one of "A," "B," or "C" apply.)+Section 3 off their guidance offers the only viable set of options -- we somehow have to replace the ''From:'' address with something else -- so that's what we'll discuss next. (Depending on your list's configuration one of "A," "B," or "C" apply.)
  
-=== How FreeLists Handles DMARC ===+===== How FreeLists Handles DMARC =====
  
 First, FreeLists detects domains that publish reject policy DMARC records. If your domain doesn't participate in DMARC or publishes a DMARC policy that isn't junk or reject, we take no action.  First, FreeLists detects domains that publish reject policy DMARC records. If your domain doesn't participate in DMARC or publishes a DMARC policy that isn't junk or reject, we take no action. 
  
-Second, if necessary, FreeLists modifies the From: header of the post to your mailing list. We replace ''user@domain.com'' with ''dmarc-noreply@freelists.org'' and move other bits of the From: header to the comment section (if made available by the sender) to improve usability. +Second, if necessary, FreeLists modifies the ''From:'' header of the post to your mailing list. We replace ''user@domain.com'' with ''dmarc-noreply@freelists.org'' and move other bits of the ''From:'' header to the comment section (if made available by the sender) to improve usability. 
  
-If your subscriber's domain uses DMARC and the From: header was originally:+If your subscriber's domain uses DMARC and the ''From:'' header was originally:
  
-''From: Jane Doe <jdoe@baddomain.com>''+<code> 
 +From: Jane Doe <jdoe@baddomain.com> 
 +</code>
  
 We'll replace that with: We'll replace that with:
  
-''From: "Jane Doe" <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> (Redacted sender "jdoe" for DMARC)''+<code> 
 +From: "Jane Doe" <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> (Redacted sender "Jane Doe" for DMARC) 
 +</code>
  
 This allows other subscribers on the list to get the best available understanding of who the message came from while complying with DMARC. //The exact format of this header is subject to change as we strive to improve usability.// This allows other subscribers on the list to get the best available understanding of who the message came from while complying with DMARC. //The exact format of this header is subject to change as we strive to improve usability.//
  
-== Improving usability ==+=== Improving usability ===
  
-Notice how we form the From: header. To improve usability it's important for your subscribers to put their name (it doesn't have to be their real name!) into the From: header in their email client. +Notice how we form the ''From:'' header. To improve usability it's important for your subscribers to put their name (it doesn't have to be their real name!) into the ''From:'' header in their email client. 
  
-== Big domains and DMARC ==+We do our best to maintain the Reply-to: header. If your list uses the ''reply-to-sender'' setting the original sender should be copied here so replies go back to the expected source.  
 + 
 +We add a ''X-original-sender:'' header that contains the original sender. While list subscribers can see this if they go looking at a message's full headers this is mostly intended for list admin troubleshooting. 
 + 
 +=== Big domains and DMARC ===
  
 Unfortunately the Yahoo/Verizon/AOL/Comcast email conglomerate uses DMARC, affecting a vast swath of FreeLists subscribers. Notably though Gmail does not.  Unfortunately the Yahoo/Verizon/AOL/Comcast email conglomerate uses DMARC, affecting a vast swath of FreeLists subscribers. Notably though Gmail does not. 
Line 41: Line 49:
 The following domains don't use DMARC correctly or have incorrect DMARC-like email implementations that force us to employ the DMARC workaround anyway: micron.com, sbcglobal.net, rogers.com, sky.com, ymail.com, btinternet.com, handsonsa.org, mail.ru, and cisa.dhs.gov. The following domains don't use DMARC correctly or have incorrect DMARC-like email implementations that force us to employ the DMARC workaround anyway: micron.com, sbcglobal.net, rogers.com, sky.com, ymail.com, btinternet.com, handsonsa.org, mail.ru, and cisa.dhs.gov.
  
-== Implementation notes ==+=== Implementation notes ===
  
 Don't change your ''union-lists'' setting or if you do, be very careful. Our DMARC protection works due to a feature of FreeLists known as ''union-lists'' where subscribers of another list are allowed to post on your list but don't receive its posts.  Don't change your ''union-lists'' setting or if you do, be very careful. Our DMARC protection works due to a feature of FreeLists known as ''union-lists'' where subscribers of another list are allowed to post on your list but don't receive its posts. 
  
 If the person posting to your list is from a DMARC domain //and isn't a subscriber// we'll change the address to ''dmarc-noreply-outsider@freelists.org'' in the message to list admins requesting approval to post.  If the person posting to your list is from a DMARC domain //and isn't a subscriber// we'll change the address to ''dmarc-noreply-outsider@freelists.org'' in the message to list admins requesting approval to post. 
- 
- 
  
  
dmarc.txt · Last modified: 2023/10/26 20:49 by staff