Not to be argumentative, well, maybe, <smile> But I'm wondering why descriptions related to adult content of the type we've been discussing should go into a review and not into the longer synopsis. I see one problem with that approach. The validator or submitter who had the concern might not be able to access the book once published. We do have volunteers who are not elligible to download the books after publication. Also, people use to web braille and tb topics and braille book review are use to seeing those content disclaimors posted with the book descriptions. I know there is no mechanism for a separate review on such services, of course. but it seems to me that you'd want these concerns more accessible. If somebody sees a synopsis and thinks a book looks good, they may not bother to read somebody's review, since they're already convinced they want to download it, based on the synopsis, or just the author.title, without benefit of needing to read the review. Just some food for thought and a possible change of policy. mary