[bksvol-discuss] Re: Carrie's Scans And Word Weirdness

  • From: "tom hawkins" <tjhawk1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:34:06 -0700

Hi Carrie, Actually there are three types of section-breaks that Word 
recognizes . but haven't seen the third type show up any where yet. Tom
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Carrie Karnos 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 6:45 AM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Carrie's Scans And Word Weirdness


  I was planning on telling the whole list what I found.  Sure wish Word could 
distinguish between the 2 types of section breaks.  That would make life much 
easier!

  Carrie

  tom hawkins <tjhawk1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    Hi Carrie, Would you mind alerting me also of your results? I've been 
encountering trouble with Fine-Reader 8 also. I don't know if it's me but I've 
been getting too much junk. Went back to omni-page 15 and almost perfect scans, 
even though much slower. Thanks Tom
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Carrie Karnos 
      To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 5:47 AM
      Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Carrie's Scans And Word Weirdness


      Hi Monica,

      Sorry to hear about the problems with my scans.  I was about to say that 
nothing changed at the office 3-4 months ago, but I'm not sure that's true.  I 
started using version 8 of Finereader instead of version 7 several months ago, 
but I'd guess it's 6 months or so.  I wonder if that's what has caused the 
difference.  If you give me the name of a book with the problem, I'll run the 
.tif file through Finereader 7 and see if I can spot any differences in the 
output between the 2 versions of Finereader.  Or I can find a short book at the 
office and run a check myself.  Will let you know what I find out. Maybe I will 
have to go back to using Finereader 7...

      Sorry!   Carrie

      Monica Willyard <plumlipstick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        Hi. I'm writing to ask for help. Lately when I take one of Carrie's 
        scans, I keep running into the same problem. When I get the rtf 
        file, it has section breaks as always. However, when I use the find 
        and replace feature and replace ^b with ^m it makes 2 page breaks for 
        every section break that used to be there, and column breaks start 
        showing up where there were none before I do this replacement. This 
        only happens with Carrie's recent scans. I tried an older scan done 
        by Carrie, and it worked perfectly. This didn't start happening till 
        about 2 or 3 months ago. Before that, this find and replace thing 
        worked just fine, and I validated 30 or 40 of Carrie's books. Does 
        anyone know what I'm dealing with and what I can do to fix it? I 
        haven't applied any updates to Office XP. Am I doing something wrong 
        and just don't know it? Once I change the section breaks to page 
        breaks, sometimes the page number and header will have a page break 
        above it and then right below it so that a book of 500 pages ends up 
        being over 900 pages with these breaks. I am seriously stumped. Can 
        any of you help?


        Monica Willyard

        To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
        bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list 
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call 
rates.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done 
faster.

Other related posts: