[bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:09:08 -0700
Hi, Tiffany. I believe RTF is preferred. That's the one that saves
formatting, and that is always the format they want you to convert the books
into if you download a book to validate that's in either KES or ARK. I've
never downloaded anything in plain TXT format so didn't know they wanted
that format to remain unchanged, but anyway, RTF is preferred. Take care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If your dog is fat, you aren't getting enough exercise. --Unknown
The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his
tongue. --Anonymous
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
Okay, it didn't occur to me that maybe if I didn't submit books in KES and
used a standard format more people would have access to them, and thus maybe
it would be validated a little faster. I guess it would be better if I put
them in txt or rtf. I believe one saves formatting, while the other does
not? Which is which, and more importantly, which is preferred?
Thanks,
Tiff
Other related posts:
