[bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
- From: "Jana Jackson" <jana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:46:55 -0500
Hi, Tiffany and Satauna! Tiffany, as Elizabeth said, RTF is the preferred
format, and most of the time, your scans will be validated much quicker.
Satauna, I would think that it's just a matter of submitters not being aware
of the preferred format for submissions. Possibly, some people submit txct
files because they don't have the software to convert to rtf? Not sure, but
hey, it's as good a guess as any! <Smile>
Jana
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:26 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
> Okay, it didn't occur to me that maybe if I didn't submit books in KES and
> used a standard format more people would have access to them, and thus
maybe
> it would be validated a little faster. I guess it would be better if I
put
> them in txt or rtf. I believe one saves formatting, while the other does
> not? Which is which, and more importantly, which is preferred?
> Thanks,
> Tiff
>
>
Other related posts:
