[bksvol-discuss] Re: Validtion Kurzweil versus Word documents
- From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:21:55 -0700
It does make some difference, simply because anyone can open an rtf file. So
that makes the chances better that your book will get validated faster if it
is in rtf format. If it is in Kurzweil or Word format, then only people who
have those programs can open them. That decreases the number of people who
can validate the book, so it will probably take longer. Since both the
programs you use can save files in rtf format, it would be easy for you to
submit books in that format so anyone who wants to can validate them. It
will almost certainly speed things up for your books.
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: jnuttallphd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 1:05 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Validtion Kurzweil versus Word documents
I have a questions for those validating books. For my personal scanning
needs I usually do my OCR with FineReader Pro 8.0 and save books as a Word
document. I've been sending them in that way.
I do have an older version of Kurzweil 3000 (v8) with an older version of
FineReader as the OCR engine.
Does it make a difference to validators which file type you get to help
you validate? Do you have a preference for Kuzweil or Word files? Or does it
make any difference?
Jim Nuttall--Michigan
Other related posts:
