[bksvol-discuss] Re: Volunteers: how much work is realistic

  • From: "J.M." <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:40:54 -0700

Hi, Paula. A statement straight from the horse's mouth was made a few weeks 
ago before you joined, I guess, and what you're doing is fine. Some of us 
really try to do better than that, but as long as you follow the guidelines 
you were sent and do your spellcheck and whatever else you want to do, 
that's all that's technically required of you. Some of us try for better, 
but it's not required that you do. We do appreciate all the volunteers. Take 
care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in 
your heart.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paula Mack" <pmack1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:28 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Volunteers: how much work is realistic


Hi listers,

I have been reading with some dismay the discussion regarding book 
validation.  I volunteered my time, because I was under the impression that 
volunteers were needed.  This is evident in the amount of books awaiting 
validation.  I assumed that the job involved making sure that all title, 
author and copyright information were included and that they were accurate. 
I assumed that a spellcheck would be necessary to eliminate the OCR errors 
that crop up.  The guidelines I was sent seemed to indicate this, and in 
fact, didn't even suggest spellcheck, although I think that would be 
necessary in even the most perfect scan.

However, from this list and the other Bookshare list, I am getting the 
feeling that anything less than going over each word and page number with a 
fine-tooth comb is not wanted.  Now, I can't speak for any one else, but I 
am extremely anxious to help out at bookshare.  However, when I scan my own 
books, I don't expect perfection.  When I read Bookshare books, I don't 
expect perfection.  OCR, can not, at least at this point in time, provide 
perfection.  If people have the time to go through every character 
comprising a book, that's fine.  Personally, I have a full-time job, a home, 
and a family.  I don't have that kind of time, and frankly, if I did, I 
don't think I'd want to spend it in this manner.  As an avid reader, I'd 
rather see more books available, then have less books to choose from and 
have them be perfect.

I would like the staff to make some kind of statement regarding this issue. 
If this kind of microscopic examination of each book is desired, then I 
suspect there may be less people willing to volunteer.

Personally, I still want to volunteer.  However, if following the guidelines 
as they are, along with spellchecking is not acceptable, then I would like 
to know this.  I certainly would not want to cause problems by releasing 
books that the staff does not deem acceptable.  however, if a microscopic 
examination of each book is truly what is wanted, I think this needs to be 
made clear so that potential volunteers can make an informed decision.

thanks,

Paula



Other related posts: