We've found nothing better than the plustek 3600. -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julia Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:03 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: opticbook and Kurzweil version 12 Oo, you have two scanners at your disposal, how exciting! Let me know what you find. Thanks for your help. Julia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <guidinggolden@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:44 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: opticbook and Kurzweil version 12 >I haven't had problems with my Epson 1660 but haven't connected up the >Optibook, that was tomorrow's adventure, smile. > > But my scans with the Epson are better. > > > Shelley L. Rhodes, VRT > > Guide dogs for the Blind Alumni Association > www.guidedogs.com > > Reading a book is like rewriting it for yourself. You bring to a novel, > anything you read, all your experience of the world. You bring your > history and you read it in your own terms. -Angela Carter, novelist and > journalist (1940-1992) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mystery Train" <captinlogic@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 6:36 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: opticbook and Kurzweil version 12 > > >> Maybe you have to readjust your scanning area, I don't know, don't scan >> with k1000. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Julia" <julia.kulak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 3:22 PM >> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] opticbook and Kurzweil version 12 >> >> >>> Hi everyone, I'm back. >>> I'm trying out the demo of Kurzweil version 12 with my opticbook, and >>> it seems to be getting worse results then with version 11. Even on >>> hardbacks there are errors. >>> Am I alone in my predicament? Is there some special setting I need to >>> tweak to make it work better? >>> Is it true what I've heard, that version 12 is a significant >>> improvement over 11, because from where I sit it seems like its quite a >>> bit worse. Maybe my scanner is dying, I don't know. Although considering >>> that I got it replaced six months ago I doubt that is the case. Somehow >>> it seemed to be scanning much better before the replace. >>> Can someone please shed some light on this puzzling matter. >>> Thanks in advance for your help. >>> Julia >>> Julia >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject >>> line. >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >> > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list > of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.