[bksvol-discuss] Re: question about indicating notes in text

  • From: "Chanelle Allen" <chanellem.allen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 06:49:21 -0500

Hi Mayrie,
What you said makes perfect sense.  Now I will know for the future. It is odd 
that only one note has occurred in the 100 pages or so that I have proofread.
Thanks again for your help and clear explanations.

Chanelle


From: Mayrie ReNae 
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:58 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: question about indicating notes in text


Hi Chanelle,

The asterisk is the indicator of the note.  If it is the only note on the 
page,having just an asterisk there is very common and you need that asterisk. 
Please put a space between the text to which it refers and the asterisk.

The text of the note (it's citation) belongs where you found it, at the bottom 
of the page, as notes are traditionally placed. Surrounding the entire note in 
brackets [] is perfect.

Did that make sense?

If I have been unclear, please let me know and I'll try again.

Thanks for your attention to detail!

Mayrie





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chanelle Allen
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:13 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] question about indicating notes in text


Dear Volunteer list,
I was proofreading a book when I discovered that there was a line of text 
followed by two blank lines and then another line of text which did not seem to 
belong to the previous sentence. A page break followed the text. I realized 
that the last text I saw was a note. Oddly, it began with a quote whereas its 
reference further up on the page had a * at the end of a word. After finding 
the sentence to which the note referred, I placed the note after it so that the 
page flow would not be disrupted. A blank line was inserted before and after 
the note. I also replaced the quote with a star. Was the * meant to be some 
type of superscript that was not scanned correctly? Remembering the recent 
discussion on the list and reading the directions regarding footnotes in the 
scanning and proofreading manual, I did not put begin note and end note in 
brackets. Was this correct? Or do I need to put the whole text of the note, 
which is bolded, in brackets?
I am sorry for asking so many questions, and I hope that what I have written 
makes sense.

Chanelle

GIF image

Other related posts: