Orders of belonging,morphogenetic fields, akashic residues biological
families,hellinger"families", organization internet " families."
Thanks for nice idea. Perhaps the protection offered to siblings in a bio
family is illusion based extended to inernet"families" such as this one.
That said there may be many 'degrees of thickness" in the akashic residues and
not seeing the differences might well lead to countertransference based as
opposed to deeper measured responses to those commiting some unpardonable sin
deserving exclusion.
Comments appreciated.
Enneapsychodramatics
Dr.Joseph M. Pirone 2018033080
On Saturday, January 19, 2008, at 02:53PM, <dpomail@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think this incident with Chris's decision is a good reminder to us all of
the systemic difference in what governs membership to a group.
Organizational Constellation work helps one experience the differences. When
businesses
or other organizations try to operate like families in terms of "right to
belong" the group often suffers. When an employee no longer is performing in
his
role, he is not being excluded if he is fired the way an ex-spouse or
perpetrator is excluded when cut off from the family, and the soul responses
are
different. Organizational bonds seem to be served by tying membership to ways
of behaving. I think the morphogenic field forces that order and bind family
relationships (as revealed by family constellations) offer survival value on
many levels by not being tied to specific behaviors. Hoewever, if applied
to other organizations, these belonging orders could threaten the survival of
the organization.
I'd love to hear more from OC practitioners about discoveries of the
differences.
Don Opatrny, LMFT
Connecticut, USA
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
