We are talking about acts of perpetration in causal connection with the
beginning and ending
of a human life -a lifeline.
The beginning of a lifeline caused by the mutually voluntary act of a
woman and a man
undisputedly marks the fusion of their respective systems.
If one does not consent, which makes the other a perpetrator, and a
lifeline is started by the act,
does that constitute less of a fusion of their respective systems ? I
dare say, no.
After all, to a very large extent that is the way humanity has
developed, like it or not.
Having had the privilege of witnessing the beginning and the ending of
the lifelines of loved ones in a way
that leaves no doubt they are mirror images of one another, I am convinced
the act of contributing to the ending of a lifeline -perpetration to
whatever degree-
connects the whole system of the perpetrator to the system of the victim.
And therein lies the chance for resolution: if perpetrator and victim
are having difficulties in facing each other,
the other members of their systems can lead the way e.g. by bowing to
each other,
expressing their recognition of their common bond..
It is beyond any stretch of the imagination to assume it possible to
lose ones belonging
to ones system of origin; that would be akin to proclaiming: it had
never happened.
Max
Souldance®
Cedar Pocket, Qld. Australia
