You run it just like a windows box. You can run Jaws and Ct no problem. -----Original Message----- From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Brayton Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:14 AM To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Macs and VoiceOver If you run windows on a mac, can you run jaws and caketalking with sonar? Or do you have to run the outspoken voice with mac? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Reeves" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:45 AM Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Macs and VoiceOver > Hey Jim. To answer your question, it's a little of both. Mac users tend to > be a bit shortsighted about their world view of computers, thus making > comments like Macs are better in every way. I own both, and I can tell you > this. Apple have really gone the distance when it comes to their core > audio > drivers. In a sense, they've made it possible for almost 24 tracks of > playback on an internal soundcard. And the realtech ones at that. However, > it seems like Microsoft has really stepped up their game with vista audio > as > well. I haven't looked at it, but from what people say, it's amazing. > Apple > has been in the audio business longer than Microsoft. Sound was added to > computers as an afterthought in windows, while apple has made sound as an > integral part of their machines since the late 80's. Logically then, they > have a bit of a head start. But windows has caught up in a major way. I > run > soft synths and tons of tracks of audio with no problems on my windows > box. > If it weren't any good, Digidesign would never approve a PC for recording > with Pro Tools in the windows environment. And as of about 4 years ago, > they > have. > > Software. > Currently, no recording apps are really accessible with voiceover. Sonar > is > your best bet, unless you want to buy a used g4 and 10 year-old pro tools > rig. That's how far behind you'd be if you went that route at this point. > > Build quality. I will say this about macs. I love buying them because I > know > what I'm getting the minute I unbox it. The worentee plans are amazing, > and > when you go to an apple store to get assistance, you are treated like > Elvis. > It truly is a grand experience. Whenever possible, I will always try and > buy > macs for the house, whether for media center machines or office boxes. > Even > if I'm running windows on them, they are a pleasure to use. And OS 10 is > such an awesome OS as well, that it's just plain fun. > > Price. > The fact that Macs caust more than PC's is both myth and truth. The myth > is > that all macs are more expensive than PC's. The truth is that the lower > end > macs are incredibly competitive. You can get a Mac Mini, which is a duel > core 2.0 ghz tiny little box, with about a gig of ram for 699 bucks. > They've > just come out with an iMac for 899 bucks, which is the mac that has the > CPU > and all it's components built right into the monitor. For about 14 hundred > or so, you could get a middle of the road iMac, which would be decent for > recording if you're not planning on recording with a billion huge > orchestral > softsynths. Truth is, you'd get along fine, as long as you upgraded the > ram > to 4 gigs. Here's the gocha part of this whole thing. > If you want to slip into a real professional model, a machine that has > tons > of horse power, you're jumping up to about 26 hundred bucks, and that's at > the bottom of the totem pole. So indeed there is some truth to the above > statement about macs costing more. Entry level macs are competitively > priced, while high end macs are in the stratosphere. The reason for this > is > that they literally are using the best parts the market has to offer. The > procs are xeon server grade chips, not really necessary for recording, but > if you've got the money, go for it. And there are 8 of them, which windows > can't see them all anyway, so you're looking at tons of stuff you won't > use > right now. I thought about saving for one, but once I crunched the > numbers, > I realized I could build something closer to my needs for almost a third > of > the price. You could get a macbook or macbook pro laptop, which varies in > price from screen size and speed. My 1200 dollar macbook has served me > well > for my needs. It's all about what you're trying to accomplish. I'll > definitely grab a mac minie in the next few months as an office computer > that can run both windows and the Mac OS. The price is right. But for pro > recording, I just spent 800 bucks on a shuttle box. That will last me for > a > while. I can't justify a 3000 dollar price tag for a Mac Pro. Not yet any > way. > > Hope this gives you some insight. > > Reeves > > > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! > To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > and in the Subject line type > unsubscribe > For other list commands such as vacation mode, > click on the immediately following link: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or > send a message, to > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > and in the Subject line type > faq > > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq