[ddots-l] Re: Point of Audio Editors?

  • From: Jack Conti <jackconti@xxxxxxx>
  • To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:01:53 -0400

Brandon there have been entire books written on mastering its astoundingly complex. and as far as audacity i like it for its audio capabilities but it leaves out the midi side of things. At 01:58 PM 4/13/2014, you wrote:

    Hello,
What is involved in mastering? I'm surprised you can't master in Gold Wave, Audacity or Wavepad. Is there a "master" button, or wouldn't you select the whole project and hit equalize? I don't know about any sound editors but Audacity, but Audacity lets you have a lot of tracks. I've had up to 20 in one project.
Someone should go the extra mile and make audacity into a daw...
thanks,

Brandon Keith Biggs

On 4/13/2014 10:08 AM, D!J!X! wrote:
Some people like to work on the finished product as a single track project,
instead of a multitrack product. For example, allot  of people will mix
their projects in sonar, and export them as a wave file that they master in
sound forge (audio editor). One of the main differences between daws and
audio editors is multitrack abilities; the daw programs can and do
multitracks of audio and MIDI data, the audio editor is usually limited to 1
file/1 or 2 tracks of data (mono or stereo files), or 5.1 for surround sound
in some cases. The other thing, a DAW can use instruments and vst's, while
some editors can use vst effects and such, don't think you could run a
virtual instrument through one and record it and edit it. Also, MIDI is a
crucial part of a DAW like sonar, for inputting musical data from a keyboard
or guitar controller etc, but for audio editors, this area is usually
limited and mainly it is used for controling features of the program itself,
like using MMC. The DAW will let you edit and manipulate the MIDI data, do
more with it in terms of recording, than an audio editor would. While some
of the functions do overlap, there are some differences. For example if you
are mainly going to be recording simple stereo files with no multitrack
needs, then goldWave or sound forge is fine. Or I know people who literally
do a mix on their mixers and record it as a stereo file as the final result,
they do everything else outboard, compressors, effects etc. While this
limits your ability to edit each part individually, this method works for
them and that's how they do it; they use GoldWave to record the stuff, apply
some final compression and whatever effects they want, and distribute
online. It all depends on what you need, what your requirements are, and
what your workflow is.

HTh, D!J!X!

-----Original Message-----
From:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brandon Keith Biggs
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 1:37 AM
To:ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Point of Audio Editors?

Hello,
What is the point of an audio editor?
Don't Daws work just as well as an audio editor? I've been looking at
different accessible audio editors and daws and Gold Wave, Wave Pad and
Audacity seem to just have destructive editing, ability to record sound and
add effects. Each of the above 3 have their own nifty stand out feature
(gold wave will play sounds as you arrow through a large list of sounds
without you opening them, Wavepad does batch file conversion and Audacity is
free with one of the best noise removal plugins out there).
But when it comes down to recording and making a quality recording, Reaper,
Sonar and Pro Tools seem to have the same features of the sound editors as
well as midi and way more effects.
Reaper is the same price as any of the sound editors and Sonar is massive
with a huge library of sounds. I understand people using Audacity, but I
don't understand why one would go for the $60 of the other audio editors
unless their little extra features are really worth it.
Thanks,

--
Brandon Keith Biggs

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately
following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq  or send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  and in the Subject line type faq


PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq  or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

Other related posts: