Bryan If I may if anyone uses jfw 11, make sure to use the latest update, and not just the cd. Earlier versionbs of 11 ate authorizations like crazy acording to jfw support and i surely expericneced it here, <smile. now those days are over <smile>
At 11:30 AM 1/12/2012, you wrote:
8.5 is definitely better for audio people than 8.3. Besides the additional 64-bit combination effects that come with Sonar 8.5, AudioSnap is far more stable than it used to be.The key to having a good experience with CakeTalking is to be sure to use only the software version combinations that have been tested. Due to slight differences with how different versions of Jaws behave, and, in some cases, bugs that CakeTalking must work around, CakeTalking is highly sensitive to changes in the Jaws version, in particular. I'm not saying that it isn't possible to use CakeTalking 8.5 with Jaws 10 on Windows 7, but, if you do, you may find gotchas where CakeTalking is sluggish, where certain commands are slow or don't work at all, or where incorrect information is reported.For CakeTalking 8.3 and 8.5 users, Jaws 11 is suggested on all versions of Windows. Again, you could use Jaws versions as old as 10 on Windows 7, Jaws 8 on Vista, and Jaws 7.1 on XP, but you really should use 11. Jaws 11 has been extensively tested with CT, and is known to work well (that is, we account for all of the qwerks in Jaws 11 :)).Bryan On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Mike Christer wrote: > Hey Nickus! > > Thanx for the advice... > > I don't use any soft synths, so its probably best staying with 8.3! > > I'm still using JAWS v8 on this DAW, although I do have JAWS 13, I know my > current set-up worx great so I'll stay with it! > > Thanx again! > > l8r > > Mike > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nickus de Vos" <bigboy529@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:21 AM > Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Sonar 8.3 or 8.5? > > >> I updated to 8.5 the other day and personally I prefer 8.3 it's as if >> some stuff just doesn't happen smoothly anymore, not in terms of sound >> or instrument quality but in terms of working with sonar. it could >> also maybe be because I now also have jaws 13 but I'm not sure. I >> don't know if it's possible to go back down to 8.3 but if it's >> possible I'm going back down. I would say try it maybe it's just my >> imagination and if you use a lot of soft synths 8.5 would be better in >> terms of quality but if you mostly only use audio like I do, then I >> don't see any point in 8.5 if you have 8.3. Oh one more thing if you >> update, make sure you update to 8.5.3 the latest version otherwise >> things like the track inspector won't work. >> >> On 1/9/12, Mike Christer <christer.christer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>> Please could someone tell me if there's any genuine advantage of updating>>> my >>> DAW from Sonar v8.3 to v8.5? >>> >>> I've had v8.5 for over a year, but v8.3 worx so well for me so I'm >>> reluctant >>> to update... >>> >>> Thanx for any assist... >>> >>> l8r >>> >>> >>> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! >>> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: >>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >>> If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> and in the Subject line type >>> unsubscribe >>> For other list commands such as vacation mode, >>> click on the immediately following link: >>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or >>> send a message, to >>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> and in the Subject line type >>> faq >>> >>> >> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! >> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: >> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> and in the Subject line type >> unsubscribe >> For other list commands such as vacation mode, >> click on the immediately following link: >> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or >> send a message, to >> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> and in the Subject line type >> faq >> > > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! > To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > and in the Subject line type > unsubscribe > For other list commands such as vacation mode, > click on the immediately following link: > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or > send a message, to > ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > and in the Subject line type > faq > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectsubscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq
