[ddots-l] Re: latency with sfz

  • From: "Omar Binno" <omarbinno@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:29:47 -0400

we don't have access to cuebase though, right?
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bryan Smart 
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 1:25 PM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: latency with sfz


  Unfortunately, there will always be a problem with sync between
  softsynths and hardware synths. The latency is primarily caused by your
  audio interface's input latency; the delay between when the note is
  played on the external synth, and the point when the sampled sound
  reaches an audio track in Sonar. Under great conditions, this might only
  be 2-3MS. For many people, though, they might run with 4-8MS of input
  latency. That means that, when they listen to the playback of their
  project, the audio that was recorded will seem to trail the softsynths'
  audio by about 5MS. I can notice 5MS.

  The only easy solution that I know of is to manually nudge the audio to
  compensate for the lag, but that is annoying to do each time you track
  in the sound from the hardware synth.

  This is yet another reason why I suggest that most people try to get
  away from using hardware synths if possible. You can make them work, but
  you lose the nice benefits of working in a softsynth world: instant
  recall of state, no sync issues, fast mix-down.

  Cakewalk needs an External Synth plug in like the External Insert plug
  in. Right now, I use External Insert plug ins on my mLAN return tracks
  from the Motif, since it allows the return tracks to act a little like
  softsynths. I still have sync problems, though. Of course, this isn't a
  problem in Cubase, with VST3 support. The mLAN VST3 plugs automatically
  compensate for sync. Cakewalk says that they won't support VST3....oh
  well.

  Bryan

  -----Original Message-----
  From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  On Behalf Of Tim Burgess
  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:46 PM
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: latency with sfz

  OK, bounce the external hardware synth to audio and then freeze the soft
  synth then compare the playback timing. 

  Best wishes.

  Tim Burgess
  Raised Bar Ltd
  Phone:  +44 (0)1827 719822
  Mobile:  07989 486976
  Web:  http://www.raisedbar.net
  Facebook:
  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Atherstone-United-Kingdom/Raised-Bar-Ltd/1
  2023
  4896800

  Don't forget to vote for improved access to music and music technology
  at

  http://www.raisedbar.net/petition.htm
   


  -----Original Message-----
  From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  On Behalf Of Omar Binno
  Sent: 27 August 2009 17:19
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: latency with sfz

  If you're refering to the external synth track as one of the tracks when
  you say "both tracks," the external synth track is still a midi track. i
  haven't converted that to audio yet.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tim Burgess <mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:19 PM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: latency with sfz

  Does the lag persist if you freeze both tracks?

  Best wishes.

  Tim Burgess
  Raised Bar Ltd
  Phone:  +44 (0)1827 719822
  Mobile:  07989 486976
  Web:  http://www.raisedbar.net
  Facebook:

  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Atherstone-United-Kingdom/Raised-Bar-Ltd/1
  2023
  4896800

  Don't forget to vote for improved access to music and music
  technology at

  http://www.raisedbar.net/petition.htm


  -----Original Message-----
  From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
  Behalf Of Omar Binno
  Sent: 27 August 2009 16:41
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [ddots-l] latency with sfz

  Hello,

  I notice when I record a kick from an external synth in sonar,
  then record
  one from the sfz vst, they are not hitting exactly at the same
  time, even
  after I quantize them. There seems to be a very slight delay
  from the sfz
  hit. I looked at the latency in sonar and it shows it at 5.8
  seconds, and
  the value is at 2. That seems to me pretty low and is most
  likely not the
  problem. Yes, no? Other thoughts?

  Thanks.

  Omar Binno

  Website: www.omarbinno.com
  AIM: LOD1116
  Skype: obinno1

  PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
  To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
  If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  and in the Subject line type
  unsubscribe
  For other list commands such as vacation mode, 
  click on the immediately following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
  send a message, to 
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  and in the Subject line type
  faq



  PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
  To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
  If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  and in the Subject line type
  unsubscribe
  For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately
  following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a message, to
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq

  PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
  To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
  If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  and in the Subject line type
  unsubscribe
  For other list commands such as vacation mode, 
  click on the immediately following link:
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
  send a message, to 
  ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  and in the Subject line type
  faq

Other related posts: