[ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

  • From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:23:26 -0700

Kumar,

I heard this from you and Ken and others before, and I
have already responded to it more than once that making
a change of this nature is a "new feature" as far as the
specification is concerned, so I am simply not going
to entertain the idea, at least not with this BIRD and
this discussion.

Arpad
=========================================================

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ckumar [mailto:ckumar@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 8:59 PM
To: Muranyi, Arpad
Cc: IBIS-ATM
Subject: Re: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM
teleconference

Sigrity is of the view models employing getwave preferabley should be
using init only for parameter passing. This will greatly simplify the
flow,
minimize confusion  and more importantly will not potentially result in
the
problem of the same model yielding two different results.

A useful analogy is getwve vs init similar as silicon vs behavior
circuit
models
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. ibis-macro
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2010