[ibis-macro] Re: Ccomp valid and/or to be used, when moving to on-die S-parameters?
- From: "Mirmak, Michael" <michael.mirmak@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "DBanas@xxxxxxxxxx" <DBanas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:16:56 +0000
Does this mean that C_comp as a sub-parameter should be completely ignored in
the presence of on-die S-parameters? So far, this exchange implies so.
- MM
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:15 PM
To: DBanas@xxxxxxxxxx; ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Ccomp valid and/or to be used, when moving to on-die
S-parameters?
David,
it get subsumed into the Touchstone model
Walter
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Banas
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 3:12 PM
To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-macro] Ccomp valid and/or to be used, when moving to on-die
S-parameters?
Hi Experts,
As we move away from I/V and V/T tables and towards on-die S-parameters to
model the analog behavior of output buffers, does Ccomp remain relevant as an
independent circuit element, or does it get subsumed into the Touchstone model,
for instance?
Thanks,
-db
_____
Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise
protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail,
and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
Other related posts:
