[ibis-macro] Re: Comments on BIRD 107.1
- From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:16:02 -0400
Arpad,
We are not going to resolve this until Tuesday.
I will point out that the following words are now used consistently in
sections 2.1.6, 2.2.6 and 3.1.2.1.
The new impulse response is expected to represent the filtered response.
So if the output of AMI_Init is the filter response, ie the channel impulse
response after being filtered. Then I believe that these exact same words
can be used for filtering the GetWave input as well.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:49 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Comments on BIRD 107.1
Sorry to be so picky, but I am not sure that the word
"filters" is the best way to put it. It sort of
implies more than "just convolution". Can we say
"combines, for example by convolution" like this:
| Step 4. The simulation platform takes the output of step 3 and combines
| (for example by convolution) the input
| bitstream and a unit pulse to produce an analog waveform.
Arpad
====================================================
_____
From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:32 PM
To: Muranyi, Arpad; IBIS-ATM
Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Comments on BIRD 107.1
All,
I have incorporated the changes Arpad has suggested in this E-mail. Note
that "Step 4" now says
| Step 4. The simulation platform takes the output of step 3 and filters
the input
| bitstream and a unit pulse to produce an analog waveform.
I (and SiSoft) believe that the BIRD can be submitted as enclosed.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:36 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Comments on BIRD 107.1
Hello everyone,
I read through the 107.1 draft, and found a couple of minor editorials.
Other than these, we can submit it as far as I am concerned.
1) Grammar: in the text of 2.1.6 we should change "pass" to "passes".
2) Kumar suggested not to use the word "convolves". Is this something
we would want to eliminate from "Step 4"?
3) At the end, we should add that this was discussed on the 4/1 and 4/8
meetings:
The thoughts captured in this BIRD were discussed at the April 1, 2008
meeting of the
IBIS-ATM Working Group. A slide presentation of this material is available
at:
http://tinyurl.com/28ouvx
Thanks,
Arpad
=========================================================================
Other related posts:
