Tom,
The Editorial Task Group will certainly address issues such as these in
approved BIRDs before the next revision of the specification, assuming that
edits in the ATM Task Group don't resolve them before approval.
In the meantime, to preserve a division of our limited labor, I think the focus
here is on whether the "black box" C_comp approach Randy documented addresses
the IBIS community's technical needs or not.
- MM
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] ;
On Behalf Of Tom Dagostino
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:53 PM
To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'IBIS-ATM' <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS C_comp Model BIRD
Randy
When is IBIS going to be consistent? Do we use capitals or not? Do we use
underscores or not? Are we using a dart board to make these decisions?
C_comp
C_comp Model
C Comp Corner
Really?
Tom Dagostino
971-279-5325
tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Randy Wolff ;(Redacted
sender "rrwolff" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:05 PM
To: 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] IBIS C_comp Model BIRD
Here is the document I presented in today's ATM meeting.
Randy