[ibis-macro] Re: Parameter Naming Rules BIRD
- From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'IBIS-ATM'" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:53:44 -0500 (EST)
Arpad,
I also agree that there should be no rules on Model Specific parameters.
Unfotunately, (Type Tap) parameters must now be of the form tap(-2,
tap(-1, tap(0, tap(1, tap(2, . .
So the only thing that this BIRD does is allow the user to enter (Type
Tap) parameters as tap(M2, tap(M1, tap(C0, tap(P1, tap(P2, . .
Walter
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:43 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Parameter Naming Rules BIRD
Walter,
I think this is a good idea. For reserved parameters
I think we will need to do something you are suggesting,
but for Model Specific parameters I am not sure we can
or should. The name of the parameter in that case should
be left to the model maker, not the spec. The best we
can or should do for Model Specific parameter names is a
general rule on what characters are prohibited, for example
"-", and what characters can't be used in the first position
of the parameter name. I don't think we should get into
the business of defining naming conventions, such as what
you are suggesting for the tap names.
Thanks,
Arpad
==============================================================
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:16 PM
To: IBIS-ATM; Todd Westerhoff; Adge Hawes
Subject: [ibis-macro] Parameter Naming Rules BIRD
Importance: High
All,
I plan to submit the enclosed BIRD to the Open Forum. Please read and be
prepared to decide in this Tuesday's ATM meeting whether this BIRD should
be considered for 5.1 or be deferred to 5.2.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 720.333-1107
Other related posts:
