[mac4theblind] Re: routers that are accessible?

  • From: David Hilbert Poehlman <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:05:11 -0400

you did right.

I may have been misinterpreted but some folk seem to have the idea that the mac 
is a foreign animal so that's why I put it that way.

On Oct 11, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Richard Ring <richring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I figured I'd ask, never hurts to ask!
Back to the drawing board, as they say!

You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of Fielding
 Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
richring@xxxxxxxxx

On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:17 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> Hi rich and all,
> 
> boosting is the same for all routers.  I've never had any luck with boosters 
> though.  I've noticed lately that routers are beginning to be labeled as to 
> what size area they can accomodate.
> 
> This also though depends on what the signal has to pass through to get to and 
> fro.
> 
> I do know that there are good places and bad places to position routers and 
> devices.  I've a friend who's router is in the kitchen with a mickye.  
> Imagine the uproar.
> 
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Richard Ring <richring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I have a question, and, Scott, you seem to be the one who will be able to 
> answer it. Is there any way to boost the signal on an Apple Airport Extreme? 
> I broadcast an Internet radio show, and I find myself buffering. My housemate 
> also broadcasts using the same server, and she never buffers at all. Any 
> ideas?
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> You can have an off day, but you can't have a day off! ---The Art of Fielding
>  Sent from my Mac Book Pro 
> richring@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Scott Granados <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The big problem with net gear is the forwarding rate.
>> 
>> Let's use an example to illustrate what  I mean.
>> 
>> Let's say you have a 100 megabit internet connection and you attach a 
>> Netgear something like an FW308 or insett your router here.  Of that 100 
>> megabits, you'll be lucky to actually be able to use 20.  This is because 
>> the processor used for forwarding decisions in the router is under powered 
>> for today's high speed connections.  Linksys is even worse at this with the 
>> same setup yielding 4 to 6 megabits instead of the full 100.
>> You could literally swap your net gear with a faster say DLink or as 
>> mentioned Apple Extreme and you'll feel like you have a whole new, faster 
>> connection.
>> 
>> Netgear is definitely not the worst, Linksys / Cisco hold that honor but 
>> it'd definitely not as fast as you probably need.  CHeck around if you find 
>> something that fits your price point give it a shot.  Netgear is fine on the 
>> reliability side just performance is lacking.  GO with what you like though, 
>> the good news is most hardware is accessible now so you should do well with 
>> what ever you select.  GOod luck and enjoy.
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:18 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Scott,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the info.
>>> 
>>> My last net gear router lasted over five years.  It is totally accessible 
>>> at least on the mac.  According to my reading, net gear is a top rated 
>>> brand among consumers like me.
>>> 
>>> I did research before buying but did not find info on accessibility.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Scott Granados <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would stay away from net gear but I base that on reliability and 
>>> forwarding rate, not accessibility.
>>> 
>>> In my mind on the consumer side the DLink DIR series is excellent and 
>>> forwards at line rate.  I use an 857 dual band router but I believe they 
>>> are up to the 865 now.
>>>     Other routers that are good both from a performance and accessibility 
>>> standpoint are the Ubiquiti Air Router or Air Router HP, Sonic Wall TZ 
>>> series or Edge Water.  DLink is my favorite though and has always treated 
>>> me well.
>>> 
>>> Hope that helps.
>>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:33 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman <poehlman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> For various reasons, I've ordered the following router.
>>>> NETGEAR N750 Dual Band Wi-Fi Gigabit Router (WNDR4300)
>>>> from amazon for $99.97 with free shipping.
>>>> Is this or any other router besides apple's accessible through web on the 
>>>> mac?
>>>> If this one is not accessible, which is? and if this is accessible or any 
>>>> other router is can it do all we need to do with it?
>>>> 
>>>> I suppose I could have gotten a new version of my old router which is 
>>>> failing, but like this one so went with it.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for any help.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jonnie Appleseed
>>>> With His
>>>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>>>> touching the internet
>>>> Reducing Technology's disabilities
>>>> One Byte At a time
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jonnie Appleseed
>>> With His
>>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>>> touching the internet
>>> Reducing Technology's disabilities
>>> One Byte At a time
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jonnie Appleseed
> With His
> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> touching the internet
> Reducing Technology's disabilities
> One Byte At a time
> 


-- 
Jonnie Appleseed
With His
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
touching the internet
Reducing Technology's disabilities
One Byte At a time

Other related posts: